POTTSTOWN, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: THE PRIDE GROUP INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of THE PRIDE GROUP INC. in 191 S. KEIM STREET, POTTSTOWN, PA 19464 (NAICS 423990). OSHA activity number 339654089.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE PRIDE GROUP INC.
- Site address
- 191 S. KEIM STREET
- City
- POTTSTOWN
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 19464
- Mailing
- 500 WEST SELLERS AVENUE, RIDLEY PARK, PA 19078
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423990
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees were exposed to struck by and/or crushed-by hazards: a) Warehouse - On or about March 31, 2014, employees were exposed to struck-by and/or crushed-by hazards from pallet racks that were not anchored to the floor. b) Warehouse, 1st aisle - On or about March 31, 2014, the horizontal beam of the storage rack is bent and has pallets of product weighing up to 460lbs. stored on top shelf. c) Warehouse, East Wall - On or about March 31, 2014, the Vertical beam of the storage rack is bent and has pallets of product weghing up to 460 lbs., stored on top shelf. One feasible method to correct the hazard includes, but is not limited to: Follow MH16.1- 2008, ANSI-RMI Specification for the Design, Testing and Utilization of Industrial Steel Storage Racks, Section 1.4.7, Column Base Plates and Anchors, which states that all rack columns shall be anchored to the floor with anchor bolts capable of resisting the forces caused by the horizontal and vertical loads on the rack; and 1.4.9 Rack Damage, which states upon any visible damage, the pertinent portions of the rack shall be unloaded immediately by the user until the damaged portion is repaired or replaced.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- May 2, 2014
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries: a) Rear of warehouse - On or about March 31, 2014, a marked portable fire extinguisher was blocked by pallets of product and not easily accessible. b) Front of Warehouse - On or about March 31, 2014, a markerd portable fire extinguisher was blocked by cardboard boxes and not easily accessible.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $840
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.176 B
- Issued
- May 2, 2014
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Storage of material created a hazard: a) Warehouse - On or about March 31, 2014, the pallets of storage on racks E and F, weighing up to 460lbs, are not stored or placed in a secure manner, causing a potential for the pallets to fall if racking gets struck by forklifts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.178 L05
- Issued
- May 2, 2014
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(5): The employer did not evaluate the competency of the operator who had previously received training appropriate to the truck and working conditions encountered. a) Worksite - On or about March 31, 2014, the employer did not evaluate the forklift operator who was trained by another current employer before allowing them to operate the lift in the new location.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- May 2, 2014
- Abate by
- May 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): a) Worksite - On or about March 31, 2014, the employer did not certify that the forklift operator was trained prior to allowing use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections at The Pride Group INC.
View The Pride Group INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423990)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339654089.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.