Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: 2ND WIND EXERCISE EQUIPMENT, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of 2ND WIND EXERCISE EQUIPMENT, INC. in 2000 SOUTH SYLVANIA AVENUE, STURTEVANT, WI 53177 (NAICS 451110). OSHA activity number 339656258.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch 2ND Wind Exercise Equipment, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for 2ND Wind Exercise Equipment, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2000 SOUTH SYLVANIA AVENUE
City
STURTEVANT
State
WI
ZIP
53177
Mailing
2000 SOUTH SYLVANIA AVENUE, STURTEVANT, WI 53177
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
451110
Employees
17
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,400 · Current $4,000 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to falls.      (a)  In the distribution warehouse, employees engaged in installing new storage racking were elevated on a pallet by means of a fork truck to gain access to the first level. Employees were exposed to fall hazards up to 88 inches to the lower concrete level.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4000
  • · Z (S) $5400

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    (a) In the distribution warehouse, employees involved in installing new storage racking were walking on and working from the first level of racking without means of fall protection. Employees were exposed fall hazards of 88 inches to the lower concrete level.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $5400

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck.    (a)  The employer did not ensure each powered industrial truck driver completed a training program prior to operating the Nissan and/or Toyota fork trucks in the distribution warehouse.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  (a)  The employer did not ensure that fork trucks, such as but not limited to the Nissan and Toyota, were inspected at least visually prior to being placed into service each day.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339656258.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.