Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS RODRIGUEZ, DBA RODRIGUEZ CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS RODRIGUEZ, DBA RODRIGUEZ CONSTRUCTION in 18913 EAST TWIN CREEKS DRIVE, OWASSO, OK 74055 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339657470.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Rodriguez, DBA Rodriguez Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Rodriguez, DBA Rodriguez Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
18913 EAST TWIN CREEKS DRIVE
City
OWASSO
State
OK
ZIP
74055
Mailing
9462 S 258TH PLACE, BROKEN ARROW, OK 74014
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2014
Abate by
Aug 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   On or about April 1, 2014, an employee was not provided eye protection while sawing bricks.  The employee was exposed to the hazard of being struck in the eye by flying debris.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2014
Abate by
Aug 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):   On or about April 01, 2014,  an employee worked from a scaffold that was not fully planked. The employee was exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2014
Abate by
Aug 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement:   On or about April 01, 2014,  an employee worked from second level of scaffold that did not have level footings.  The  employee was exposed to the hazard of falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2014
Abate by
Aug 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:   On or about April 01, 2014, an employee used the crossbraces of the scaffold to access the upper level of the scaffold.  Employee was exposed to the hazard of falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2014
Abate by
Aug 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.   On or about April 01, 2014, an employee worked from a scaffold that was not erected by a competent person qualified in scaffold erection.  The scaffold lacked the required components and safety factors to ensure stability   The  employee was exposed to the hazard of falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F15 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2014
Abate by
Aug 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15)(ii): The platform units were not secured to the scaffold to prevent their movement:   On or about April 01, 2014, an employee worked from second level of scaffold that was not secured/attached to the lower level to prevent movement of the upper level of the scaffold.  The employee was exposed to the hazard of falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339657470.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.