Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: REA JET

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of REA JET in 7307 YOUNG DR., WALTON HILLS, OH 44146 (NAICS 811212). OSHA activity number 339657959.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch REA JET for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for REA JET is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
REA JET
Site address
7307 YOUNG DR.
City
WALTON HILLS
State
OH
ZIP
44146
Mailing
7307 YOUNG DR., WALTON HILLS, OH 44146
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811212
Employees
31
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2014
Abate by
May 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):  The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  On or about April 2, 2014, the employer had not conducted training and evaluations of the powered industrial vehicle operators in the facility as required prior to allowing the use of equipment such as, but not limited to the Towlift forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2450
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2014
Abate by
May 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer had not developed, implemented, or maintained a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section will be met:  On or about April 2, 2014, the employer had not compiled and made available to the workers a written hazard communication program for hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to the solvents, inks, and other hazardous chemicals in use on site.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1470
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2014
Abate by
May 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):  Employee training did not include at least an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer and the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  On or about April 2, 2014,  the employer had not provided the detailed training as required for hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to the solvents and inks in use on site.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 31 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2014
Abate by
May 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  The required workplace hazard assessment was not certified as being performed, identifying the person completing the assessment, and written certification of the date of the assessment:  On or about April 2, 2014, the workplace assessment, designed to identify personal protective equipment (PPE) needed by employees to prevent injury, was not certified.    NOTE:  The assessment shall be written, titled, dated and certified by signature.  The required documented training shall include the following:    1)      When PPE is necessary; 2)      What PPE is necessary; 3)      Limitations of the PPE; 4)      How to properly wear and use the PPE, and 5)      Inspection and care of the PPE
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339657959.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.