MIRAMAR, FL —
OSHA Inspection: CASE CONTRACTING COMPANY
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of CASE CONTRACTING COMPANY in 1800 SOUTH UNIVERSITY DRIVE, MIRAMAR, FL 33025 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339659120.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CASE CONTRACTING COMPANY
- Site address
- 1800 SOUTH UNIVERSITY DRIVE
- City
- MIRAMAR
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33025
- Mailing
- 2311 TURKEY CREEK ROAD, PLANT CITY, FL 33566
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Aug 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,200 · Current $1,320 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. On or about 03/31/2014, at 1800 South University Drive, employees of a subcontractor were on the peak of a roof approximately 25-feet above the ground without fall protection.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1320
- — C (S) $2200
- — Z (S) $2200
1926.502 D16 III
- Issued
- Aug 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,640 · Current $1,584 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: On or about 04/02/2014, at the above addressed location, employees of a subcontractor working on a roof were exposed to a fall hazard due to excessively long halyards which would not prevent a fall of six feet or less.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1584
- — C (S) $2640
- — Z (S) $2640
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Aug 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,200 · Current $1,320 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head: On or about 04/02/2014, at the above addressed location, an employee of a subcontractor was exposed to a fall hazard due to an attachment point on a harness that was not in the center of the employees back.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $1320
- — C (S) $2200
- — Z (S) $2200
More inspections at Case Contracting Company
View Case Contracting Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339659120.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.