Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: SAMTEC MICROELECTRONICS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SAMTEC MICROELECTRONICS in 5050 LIST DR., COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80910 (NAICS 334419). OSHA activity number 339664849.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Samtec Microelectronics for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Samtec Microelectronics is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5050 LIST DR.
City
COLORADO SPRINGS
State
CO
ZIP
80910
Mailing
5050 LIST DR., COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80910
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334419
Employees
89
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 79 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2014
Abate by
Jul 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,920 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.    (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, the employer did not provide the appropriate hand protection for use with Hysol, known to cause allergic reactions, burns, and severe irritation.       Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see Documentation of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3920
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 79 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2014
Abate by
Jul 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from eye hazards of liquid chemicals where squeeze bottles of solvents, including acetone and isopropyl alcohol, were used without eye protection.    Abatement note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see Certification of Corrective Action worksheet).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 79 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2014
Abate by
Jul 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, the employer did not complete a written PPE Hazard Assessment to identify appropriate protective equipment for chemical hazards in the workplace.     Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that guards were in place to prevent injury during operation of the Asymtek M-620 Dispensing System.      Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see Documentation of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1428
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.303 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 79 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:  (a) On or about April 1, 2014, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that clear access was maintained around electric equipment where a knife switch was blocked by a supply cart.    Abatement note: Abatement certification is required for this item (See Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339664849.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.