NORTH LAUDERDALE, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: ALLICO CONSTRUCTION INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALLICO CONSTRUCTION INC. in 1581 SR 7, NORTH LAUDERDALE, FL 33068 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339668543.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALLICO CONSTRUCTION INC.
- Site address
- 1581 SR 7
- City
- NORTH LAUDERDALE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33068
- Mailing
- 2401 ISLAND DRIVE, MIRAMAR, FL 33023
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,040 · Current $1,020 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On or about 09 April 2014, at the above addressed job site; employees were exposed to the hazard of struck-by while using air powered nail gun without wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1020
- · Z (S) $2040
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Abate by
- May 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): a. On or about 09 April 2014, at the above addressed job site; employees were exposed to the hazard of falling while working on scaffold that was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Abate by
- May 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: a. On or about 09 April 2014, at the above addressed job site; employees were exposed to the hazard of falling while working on a scaffold which was not inspected prior to allowing employees to apply plaster, plywood and wire lard to the side of a building. The scaffold lacked guardrails, cross braces, and was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Abate by
- May 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: a. On or about 09 April 2014, at the above addressed job site; employees were exposed to the hazard of falling while working on scaffolds without being protected from falling.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Abate by
- May 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a. On or about 09 April 2014, at the above addressed job site; employees were exposed to the hazard of falling while using an extension ladder that did not extend 3 feet past the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1926.1053 B08
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Abate by
- May 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(8): Ladders placed in a location where they could be displaced by workplace activities or traffic, such as in passageways, doorways, or driveways, were not secured to prevent accidental displacement, nor was a barricade used to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder: a. On or about 09 April 2014, at the above addressed job site; employees were exposed to the hazard of falling while using an extension ladder that was not secured from displacement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339668543.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.