UNION, MO —
OSHA Inspection: ESSELTE
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ESSELTE in 850 WEST PARK RD., UNION, MO 63084 (NAICS 322231). OSHA activity number 339669152.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ESSELTE
- Site address
- 850 WEST PARK RD.
- City
- UNION
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63084
- Mailing
- 850 WEST PARK RD., UNION, MO 63084
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 322231
- Employees
- 340
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.137 B02 II
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,400 · Current $2,380 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.137(b)(2)(ii): Insulating gloves were not given an air test prior to each days usage: a. Where electrical insulating gloves were used during work on electrical equipment and where there was the potential for electrical shock, the gloves were not air tested before use. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2380
- — Z (S) $3400
1910.137 B02 VIII
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.137(b)(2)(viii): Electrical protective equipment was not subjected to periodic electrical tests in accordance with Tables I-5 and I-6: a. Where electrical insulating gloves were used during work on electrical equipment and where there was the potential for electrical shock, the gloves were not tested every six months (and according to the testing procedure required by the standard). Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.137 B02 XII
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.137(b)(2)(xii): The employer did not certify that electrical protective equipment had been tested in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs (b)(2)(viii), (b)(2)(ix), and (b)(2)(xi) of this section: a. There was no certification that electrical insulating gloves were periodically tested according to the requirements of the standard. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: a. In the hanging file folder departement, the latch on an electrical box was in disrepair inhibiting closing of the cover. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 E01
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(e)(1): Cabinets, cutout boxes, fittings, boxes, and panelboard enclosures in damp or wet locations were not installed to prevent moisture or water from entering and accumulating within the enclosures: a. In the hanging file folder department, at machine P40, pump control and junction boxes were not installed to prevent water from entering the equipment such as by mounting to prevent affecting the equipment and/or by barriers or "weather proofing" the equipment. (Note: one control pump box was setting loose on the pump table and junction boxes were broken from mounting screws; one junction box was wrapped in tape.) Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,400 · Current $2,380 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. In the hanging file folder department, such as at the P40 machine, employees cleaned by hand, rotating rollers, allowing for potential contact with moving parts or potential injury from being caught in moving parts. (Note: industry practice is to prohibit cleaning rotating rollers by direct hand contact.) Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2380
- — Z (S) $3400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 322231)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339669152.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.