Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: FELIPE JIMENEZ MARTINEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FELIPE JIMENEZ MARTINEZ in 2280 NW FEDERAL HIGHWAY, STUART, FL 34994 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339669343.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Felipe Jimenez Martinez for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Felipe Jimenez Martinez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2280 NW FEDERAL HIGHWAY
City
STUART
State
FL
ZIP
34994
Mailing
815 FAIRVIEW STREET, LAKE WORTH, FL 33461
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2014
Abate by
Sep 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):   On or about April 9, 2014, at the above addressed site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard approximately 14 feet in height while performing stucco work from the work level platform of a fabricated frame scaffold that was not fully planked.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2014
Abate by
Sep 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  On or about April 9, 2014, at the above addressed site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard while performing stucco work on a fabricated frame scaffold approximately 14 feet in height that did not have the frame legs bearing on base plates and/or other adequate foundation.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2014
Abate by
Sep 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:  On or about April 9, 2014, at the above addressed site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard while working on a the work level platform of a fabricated frame scaffold approximately 14 feet above a lower level while not being protected from falling to that lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2014
Abate by
Sep 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  On or about April 9, 2014, at the above addressed site, the competent person did not inspect a fabricated frame scaffold used by employees before the work shift for any visible defects that included, but were not limited to, the work level not being fully planked, the lack of base plates, and no fall protection system being in place.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 3, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about April 9, 2014, at the above addressed site, the employer did not implement and develop a written hazard communication plan for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, Portland Cement.  PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339669343.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.