Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: STANDARD RUBBER PRODUCTS INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STANDARD RUBBER PRODUCTS INC. in 64 B STREET, HANOVER, MA 02339 (NAICS 326299). OSHA activity number 339673196.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Standard Rubber Products INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Standard Rubber Products INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
64 B STREET
City
HANOVER
State
MA
ZIP
02339
Mailing
64 B STREET, HANOVER, MA 02339
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326299
Employees
18
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2014
Abate by
Dec 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $714 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace, including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazard(s) and an identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  Plant 1 and 2: Air monitoring had not been conducted to evaluate levels of dust exposure for workers during compounding and Banberry mixing operations.  Air contaminants include but not limited to dusts that may contain silica(talc) and metals.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $714
  • · Z (S) $1020

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,156 · Current $809 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel:  Plant 2;  The Ohio Forge bench grinder was not equipped with adequate tongue guards. The right abrasive wheel did not have a tongue guard and the left wheel had a guard that was bent and not operational.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $809.2
  • · Z (S) $1156

1910.219 I02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2014
Abate by
Oct 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(i)(2): Revolving surfaces of shaft coupling(s) were not covered by a safety sleeve:  Plant 1:   a) Rotating shaft couplings on the Banberry Mill # 1 were not guarded.   b) Oil pump for the Banberry #3 was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $952
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.37 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":  Break Room: There was no EXIT sign on the door leading to the outside.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  Plant 1:    A knock out opening was not covered on an electrical disconnect box.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2014
Abate by
Oct 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  a) Banbury Platform:   1.  A black drum of lubrication oil was not labeled with a health hazard warning.  2. Totes of rubber ingredients were not labeled with health hazard warning.  b) Compounding: Totes of rubber ingredients were not labeled with health hazard warnings.  NOTE: Those containers handled by one employee and container contents used within a work shift do not required the hazard warning label.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): Employees had not been provided with training including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  Plant 1 and 2: Workers had not received training on the new hazard communication standard requirements for labeling and safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Standard Rubber Products INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339673196.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.