Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: GIUSEPPE FALCONE AND DANIELE FALCONE

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GIUSEPPE FALCONE AND DANIELE FALCONE in 296 BEACON STREET, BOSTON, MA 02116 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 339674897.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Giuseppe Falcone and Daniele Falcone for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Giuseppe Falcone and Daniele Falcone is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
296 BEACON STREET
City
BOSTON
State
MA
ZIP
02116
Mailing
59 WAITE STREET EXTENSION, MALDEN, MA 02148
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238120
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,333 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:    Location:  Job sites and Shop    The employer provided and allowed the use of respirators without providing employees with the information in Appendix D of the respirator standard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2333
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,333 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    Location:  Shop and job sites    The company did not establish and implement elements of a written respirator program that relate to the medical evaluation of respirator users, and the cleaning, storage, and maintenance of respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2333
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,334 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form:    The company has not evaluated the respiratory hazards of workplace chemicals such as paints, welding fumes, and concrete dust.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2334
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,333 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    Job sites and Shop    The company did not have a written hazard communication program to inform and help protect employees from exposures to chemicals such as welding fumes, paints, primers, and crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2333
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,333 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    Employees had not received hazard communication training, including the hazards of workplace chemicals and the methods to control those hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2333
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Dec 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,334 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace:    Location:  Shop and Job Sites    The employer is not maintaining copies of safety data sheets for potentials hazardous workplace chemicals such as paints, primers, welding sticks, metals and concrete dust.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2334
  • · Z (S) $5000

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Sep 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  The company did not adequately train employees in workplace safety, including fire safety.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $7000

1926.24

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Oct 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.24: The employer did not develop and/or maintain an effective fire protection and  prevention program at the job site throughout all phases of the construction, repair, alteration or  demolition work and/or did not ensure the availability of the fire protection and suppression equipment  required by Subpart F of this part:  Location: 296 Beacon Street, Boston  The employer did not maintain an effective fire protection and prevention program and, as a result, welding sparks ignited the adjacent building and caused a fire on or about March 26, 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $7000

1926.352 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.352(a): Readily moveable objects to be welded on, cut or heated were not moved to a designated safe location away from fire hazards:  Location:  296 Beacon Street, rear of building.  A railing being installed at a stairway was not moved to a safe location for welding or cutting.  Sparks from the welding / cutting operation ignited wood clapboard on the adjacent building and caused a fire on or about March 26, 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $7000

1926.352 E

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.352(e): Additional fire prevention precautions were not provided when welding, cutting, or heating operations were such that normal fire prevention precautions were not sufficient:  Location: 296 Beacon Street, Boston      The company did not take additional fire prevention precautions, such as the use of a fire watcher while using welding equipment to cut a railing during windy conditions on or about March 26, 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $7000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339674897.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.