Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: C & M IRON AND METAL CO., INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of C & M IRON AND METAL CO., INC. in 2390 W. HAMPDEN AVE., SHERIDAN, CO 80110 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 339676496.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch C & M Iron and Metal CO., INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for C & M Iron and Metal CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2390 W. HAMPDEN AVE.
City
SHERIDAN
State
CO
ZIP
80110
Mailing
2390 W. HAMPDEN AVE., SHERIDAN, CO 80110
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Abate by
Jun 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:     (a) On or about April 15, 2014 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to corrosive hazards where employees handle vehicle batteries.  The employer did not provide suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing eyes in the immediate work area for emergency use.    Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $700
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Abate by
Jun 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point of operation guards were not designed and constructed as to prevent the operators from having any part of their bodies in the danger zone during the operating cycle:    (a)  On or about April 15, 2014, and at times prior, the employer did not protect employees from amputation hazards at the Schott Shear and the Enterprise MFG Scrap Processing Equipment shear where the employees reach under the static guards to place materials in the cutting mechanism.      Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1700

1910.303 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Abate by
Jun 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:    (a)  On or about April 15, 2014, and at times prior, the employer did not protect employees from electrical hazards in that the electrical panels in the non-ferrous building were blocked from access by stored items.     Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $600
  • · Z (S) $1020

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Abate by
Jun 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:  (a)  On or about April 15, 2014, and at times prior, the employer did not protect employees from electrical hazards in that the outlet box in the vestibule of the recycling office that had the coffee pot plugged into it, did not have a faceplate.  Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Abate by
Jun 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:  (a) On or about April 15, 2014, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to electrical hazards in that an extension cords was used as fixed wiring to connect the mini-fridge in the work area to the outlet.   Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Abate by
Jun 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  (a)  On or about April 15, 2014, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from electrical hazards where the wiring was not protected at the fitting into the machine and on the plug end of the cord of the wire stripper, and the wiring was not protected at the fitting into the machine on the Enterprise MFG Scrap shear.  Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Abate by
Jul 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  (a)  On or about April 15, 2014, the employer had not provided training employees on the new label elements, signal words, and safety data sheets format, that was required to be completed by December 1, 2013.     Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339676496.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.