BRONX, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: AGUILA, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AGUILA, INC. in 1195 SHERMAN AVE BASEMENT, BRONX, NY 10456 (NAICS 624221). OSHA activity number 339680910.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AGUILA, INC.
- Site address
- 1195 SHERMAN AVE BASEMENT
- City
- BRONX
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10456
- Mailing
- 1195 SHERMAN AVE BASEMENT, BRONX, NY 10456
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 624221
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2014
- Abate by
- May 8, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": a) Basement: The emergency exit did not have an "Exit" sign; on or about 04/15/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.141 A03 I
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2014
- Abate by
- May 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(i): Places of employment were not kept clean to the extent that the nature of the work allowed a) In basement bathroom: Mold was observed growing in the employee's bathroom on the wall above the toilet; on or about 04/15/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.141 A05
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2014
- Abate by
- May 8, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(5): A continuing and effective extermination program was not instituted where rodents, insects, or other vermin were detected a) Basement: Where there was evidence of vermin infestation in the workplace the employer did not have an effective extermination program; on or about 04/15/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.1001 J03 I
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2014
- Abate by
- May 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(3)(i): The building owner, facility owner, or employer did not determine the presence, location, and quantity of ACM or PACM at the worksite and did not exercise due diligence in complying with these requirements to inform employers and employees about the presence and location of asbestos-containing material (ACM) and presumed asbestos containing material (PACM): a) Basement: The employer did not perform an asbestos survey for an overhead steam pipe insulated with Presumed Asbestos-Containing Material (PACM); on or about 04/15/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 624221)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339680910.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.