Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: AGUILA, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AGUILA, INC. in 1195 SHERMAN AVE BASEMENT, BRONX, NY 10456 (NAICS 624221). OSHA activity number 339680910.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aguila, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aguila, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AGUILA, INC.
Site address
1195 SHERMAN AVE BASEMENT
City
BRONX
State
NY
ZIP
10456
Mailing
1195 SHERMAN AVE BASEMENT, BRONX, NY 10456
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
624221
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Abate by
May 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":   a) Basement:  The emergency exit did not have an "Exit" sign; on or about 04/15/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.141 A03 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Abate by
May 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(i): Places of employment were not kept clean to the extent that the nature of the work allowed   a) In basement bathroom:  Mold was observed growing in the employee's bathroom on the wall above the toilet; on or about 04/15/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.141 A05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Abate by
May 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(5): A continuing and effective extermination program was not instituted where rodents, insects, or other vermin were detected  a) Basement:   Where there was evidence of vermin infestation in the workplace the employer did not have an effective extermination program; on or about 04/15/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.1001 J03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Abate by
May 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(3)(i): The building owner, facility owner, or employer did not determine the presence, location, and quantity of ACM or PACM at the worksite and did not exercise due diligence in complying with these requirements to inform employers and employees about the presence and location of asbestos-containing material (ACM) and presumed asbestos containing material (PACM):  a) Basement:  The employer did not perform an asbestos survey for an overhead steam pipe insulated with Presumed Asbestos-Containing Material (PACM); on or about 04/15/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339680910.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.