Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: CAMPUZANO ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CAMPUZANO ROOFING in 513 BRAUMILLER CROSSING DRIVE, DELAWARE, OH 43015 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339687733.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Campuzano Roofing for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Campuzano Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CAMPUZANO ROOFING
Site address
513 BRAUMILLER CROSSING DRIVE
City
DELAWARE
State
OH
ZIP
43015
Mailing
4786 FROST AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2014
Abate by
May 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,700
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.     a)     On or about April 18, 2014, at the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided and used fall protection while performing roof repair work around the chimney, at heights greater than six feet, thereby exposing employees to an approximate 17 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1700

1926.503 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2014
Abate by
Jun 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $1,020
29 CFR 1926.503(c): "Retraining." When the employer has reason to believe that any affected employee who has already been trained does not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section, the employer shall retrain each such employee. Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where:  29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill.     a)     On or about April 18, 2014, at the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees had a clear understanding on the requirements of fall protection use when working at heights greater than six feet.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1020

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2014
Abate by
May 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,700
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.     a)     On or about April 18, 2014, at the worksite, the employer did not ensure that the extension ladder that was used to access and exit the roof area, was extended at least three feet above the roof working/walking surface, thereby exposing employees to a potential trip/fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1700

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339687733.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.