Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: E.R.L. SERVICES INC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of E.R.L. SERVICES INC in 1276 NORTH RIO VISTA BLVD., FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339689507.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch E.R.L. Services INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for E.R.L. Services INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
E.R.L. SERVICES INC
Site address
1276 NORTH RIO VISTA BLVD.
City
FORT LAUDERDALE
State
FL
ZIP
33316
Mailing
396 NW 40TH COURT SUITE 101, OAKLAND PARK, FL 33309
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2014
Abate by
Jul 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  On or about April 18, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard while working from a scaffold which was not fully planked.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2014
Abate by
Jul 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and/or walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide:  On or about April 18, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard while working from a scaffold which only had one 10-inch wide plank.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2014
Abate by
Jul 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15): Ladders were used on scaffolds to increase the working level height of employees: without satisfying the criteria of subparagraphs (i) - (iv) of this paragraph:  On or about April 18, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, three employees were exposed to fall hazards while using a closed A-frame ladder on top of a scaffold to reach a roof.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2014
Abate by
Jul 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):  On or about April 18, 2014 at the above addressed jobsite, two employees were exposed to fall hazards while sweeping debris from a roof without any fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2014
Abate by
Jul 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:  On or about April 18, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to fall hazards while using a closed A-frame ladder which did not extend three feet above the landing.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2014
Abate by
Jul 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:  On or about April 18, 2014 at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to fall hazards while using an A-frame ladder in the closed to position to gain access to a roof.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2014
Abate by
Jul 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladder(s) with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately removed from use:  On or about April 18, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to fall hazards while using a closed A-frame ladder which had broken side hinges and perforated side rails.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

View E.R.L. Services INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339689507.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.