Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: MARKVEND COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MARKVEND COMPANY in 3000 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD, NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 (NAICS 454210). OSHA activity number 339714123.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Markvend Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Markvend Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARKVEND COMPANY
Site address
3000 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD
City
NORTHBROOK
State
IL
ZIP
60062
Mailing
3000 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD, NORTHBROOK, IL 60062
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
454210
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(b)(1): Where mechanical handling equipment was used, sufficient safe clearances were not allowed for aisles, at loading docks, through doorways and wherever turns or passage had to be made:    a) Warehouse Area- The employer failed to ensure that all aisles and passageways that were used by mechanical handling equipment throughout the facility were kept clear, such as in the Soda Aisles.     No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.36 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,570 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2): Exit access(es) were not at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points.    a) Warehouse Area- The employer failed to keep all routes of exit access at least 28 inches wide at all points, such as the area in the Coffee and Water Aisles.     No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $3570

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment:    a) Warehouse Area- The employer failed to perform an assessment of the workplace to determine if hazards were present that would necessitate the use of personal protective equipment such as, gloves, safety goggles and face shields when adding water to powered industrial vehicle batteries.    No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye and face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:  a) Warehouse Area- The employer failed to require the use of eye protection, such as safety goggles and a face shield, for employees that were exposed to corrosive chemicals (sulfuric acid) while performing tasks such as adding water to batteries on powered industrial vehicles.    No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances:    a) Warehouse Area- The employer failed to require the use of appropriate personal protective equipment, such as chemical resistant gloves, when employees were exposed to burn hazards when exposed to corrosive chemicals such as battery acid as a part of their job tasks.    No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $1785

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Abate by
Jun 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    a) Warehouse Area- The employer failed to ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate powered industrial trucks, such as the Crown Walking Forklift, Serial #6A173055, and the Hyster Electric Pallet Jack, Serial #B215H02540X, safely as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1300
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.303 G01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage:    a) Warehouse Area- The employer failed to ensure that the space around electrical equipment, such as the space in front of the four electrical panels near the North Center Dock, was not used for storage of materials.     No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1785

1904.32 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 42 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $595 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(1): The employer did not complete the OSHA 300A Form or equivalent and post it February 1 thru April 30.    a) Facility Wide- The employer failed to ensure that the OSHA 300A Form, or an equivalent form, was completed and posted for the previous calendar year, 2013, from February 1, 2014, through April 30, 2014.     No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $595

View Markvend Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339714123.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.