Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: RANDAL KOENIG

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of RANDAL KOENIG in 1699 WEEDEN CREEK RD, SHEBOYGAN, WI 53081 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339738510.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Randal Koenig for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Randal Koenig is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RANDAL KOENIG
Site address
1699 WEEDEN CREEK RD
City
SHEBOYGAN
State
WI
ZIP
53081
Mailing
1328 GEELE AVE, SHEBOYGAN, WI 53083
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2014
Abate by
May 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On 4/21/14, employees working on the ground below another worker on the roof were not provided with hardhats to protect them from falling objects.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2014
Abate by
May 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.   On 4/21/14, employees performing roofing work were not wearing or provided with safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2014
Abate by
May 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  On 4/21/14, employees reroofing a two story steep pitch house were not protected from falls from:  a) One employee on the 12:12 pitch section of the roof was working from roof jacks and was not connected to a lifeline.  b) One employee on the 4:12 pitch garage roof had no fall protection of any kind.  c) Two skylights on the single story section of the roof were not covered to prevent workers from falling through.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.503 A02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2014
Abate by
May 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii):  On and before 4/21/14, the employees had not been trained by a competent person on how to set up and use personal fall arrest systems, or when fall protection was necessary.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2014
Abate by
May 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:   On 4/21/14, three flexible ladders were in use to access different portions of the roof and none of them extended >3' above the eave edge.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2014
Abate by
May 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, enabling each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  On and before 4/21/14, employees using ladders during roofing work had not been trained to properly inspect, set up or use the ladders provided by the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339738510.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.