Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: ADDIVANT USA, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ADDIVANT USA, LLC in 1000 MORGANTOWN INDUSTRIAL PARK, MORGANTOWN, WV 26501 (NAICS 325199). OSHA activity number 339741506.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Addivant USA, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Addivant USA, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ADDIVANT USA, LLC
Site address
1000 MORGANTOWN INDUSTRIAL PARK
City
MORGANTOWN
State
WV
ZIP
26501
Mailing
1000 MORGANTOWN INDUSTRIAL PARK, MORGANTOWN, WV 26501
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325199
Employees
115
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of operating hydrochloric acid storage tanks without operational high liquid level sensors to alert employees to take action before a storage tank overfills and ruptures:  (a)  North Plant 181 Tank Farm: On or about April 4, 2014 a storage tank of 36 percent grade hydrochloric acid (HCl) was overfilled and ruptured releasing approximately 100 gallons of its contents. This tank, and other similar HCl tanks, were operated with a non-functional high liquid level sensor that would have activated an alarm alerting unit operators that were away from the control room of a hazardous high level in the tank.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.134 D01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability:  (a) 181 Tank Farm:  On or about April 4, 2014 an employee (Production Technician) was assigned to wear a powered air purifying respirator (PAPR) into an unknown concentration, instead of an atmosphere supplying respirator, at the tank farm after the accidental rupture of two tanks that resulted in the release of 36 percent hydrochloric acid into the tank farm.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.134 K01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of the limitations and capabilities of the respirator:  (a) 181 Tank Farm:  On or about April 4, 2014 an employee (Production Technician) and plant management did not demonstrate proper knowledge on the limitations of air purifying respirators in that the employee was assigned by management to wear a powered air purifying respirator (PAPR) into an unknown atmosphere at the tank farm after the accidental rupture of two tanks that resulted in the release of 36 percent hydrochloric acid into the tank farm.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.119 E03 VII

Other-than-serious 1 instance 115 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(vii): The process hazard analysis did not address a qualitative evaluation of a range of the possible safety and health effects of failure of controls on employees in the workplace.  (a) TPP Process - North Plant:  The employer's HAZ-OP study used as the initial Process Hazard Analysis did not include a range of the possible safety and health effects of each hazard scenario identified in the study as determined on or about May 6, 2014.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.119 E05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 115 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2014
Abate by
Sep 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not assure that PHA recommendations were resolved in a timely manner:  (a) TPP Process - North Plant:  On or about May 6, 2014 the employer's 2013 revalidation of the Process Hazard Analysis for the TPP Process had not resolved a recommendation to determine if the PCl3 unloading procedures should include rotation of use of the unloading pumps.  This recommendation was targeted to be complete by February 28, 2014 and was marked as closed.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339741506.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.