MARIETTA, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: SAUL SAUCEDA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SAUL SAUCEDA in 3339 ACORN FALLS DRIVE LOT #11, MARIETTA, GA 30062 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 339742249.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SAUL SAUCEDA
- Site address
- 3339 ACORN FALLS DRIVE LOT #11
- City
- MARIETTA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30062
- Mailing
- 36 LAROSE DRIVE SW, MARIETTA, GA 30060
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- May 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury: (a) The employer did not instruct the employees in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the methods to control or eliminate hazards associated with their work environment, such as, but not limited to, working from unprotected elevated areas and using pneumatic nail guns. The employees were exposed to struck-by and fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A
- Issued
- May 12, 2014
- Abate by
- May 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: (a) The employer did not train employees installing fascia from a job-made scaffold to ensure the employees were able to recognize and minimize the hazards associated with working from scaffold systems. The employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 19-feet, 10-inches to the next lower level.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 12, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: (a) In the front of the residence, employees were using pneumatic nail guns to install fascia on a 2-story single family residence without protective eyewear. The employer did not ensure safety glasses were being used, exposing the employees to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- May 12, 2014
- Abate by
- May 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: (a) In the front of the residence, a job-made scaffold that was being used to install fascia on a 2-story single family residence was not designed and erected by a qualified person, exposing the employees to a fall of approximately 19-feet, 10-inches to the next lower level.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 B02
- Issued
- May 12, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide: (a) In the front of the residence, employees were installing fascia on a 2-story single family residence from a job-made scaffold that was equipped with 10-inch and 12-inch wide platforms, exposing the employees to a fall of more than 19-feet to the next lower level.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- May 12, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: (a) In the front of the residence, the employer did not provide a safe means of access for employees using a job-made scaffold to install fascia on a two-story single family home, exposing the employees to a fall of more than 19-feet to the next lower level.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- May 12, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: (a) In the front of the residence, employees were working from a job-made scaffold installing fascia on a 2-story single family residence without the use of a fall protection system. The employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 19-feet, 10-inches to the next lower level.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339742249.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.