Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MAURICIO MARTINEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MAURICIO MARTINEZ in 375 HUTCHINSON AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43235 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339742835.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mauricio Martinez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mauricio Martinez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MAURICIO MARTINEZ
Site address
375 HUTCHINSON AVENUE
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43235
Mailing
1497 ELMORE AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43224
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2014
Abate by
May 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $980 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(3): "Hoist areas." Each employee in a hoist area shall be protected from falling 6 feet (1.8 m) or more to lower levels by guardrail systems or personal fall arrest systems. If guardrail systems, [or chain, gate, or guardrail] or portions thereof, are removed to facilitate the hoisting operation (e.g., during landing of materials), and an employee must lean through the access opening or out over the edge of the access opening (to receive or guide equipment and materials, for example), that employee shall be protected from fall hazards by a personal fall arrest system.          a)     At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided and used some means of fall protection when landing materials on the second level of the new build hotel, thereby exposing employees to an approximate 11 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $980
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2014
Abate by
Jun 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $980 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(c): "Retraining." When the employer has reason to believe that any affected employee who has already been trained does not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section, the employer shall retrain each such employee. Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where:    29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill.          a)     On the site, the employer did not ensure that employees performing the task of landing materials on the second level, by the hoisting area, were clear on the requirements for knowing when and/or what type of fall protection should have been used when working at heights greater than six feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $980
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Mauricio Martinez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339742835.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.