COLUMBUS, OH —
OSHA Inspection: MAURICIO MARTINEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MAURICIO MARTINEZ in 375 HUTCHINSON AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43235 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339742835.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAURICIO MARTINEZ
- Site address
- 375 HUTCHINSON AVENUE
- City
- COLUMBUS
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43235
- Mailing
- 1497 ELMORE AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43224
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B03
- Issued
- May 16, 2014
- Abate by
- May 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $980 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(3): "Hoist areas." Each employee in a hoist area shall be protected from falling 6 feet (1.8 m) or more to lower levels by guardrail systems or personal fall arrest systems. If guardrail systems, [or chain, gate, or guardrail] or portions thereof, are removed to facilitate the hoisting operation (e.g., during landing of materials), and an employee must lean through the access opening or out over the edge of the access opening (to receive or guide equipment and materials, for example), that employee shall be protected from fall hazards by a personal fall arrest system. a) At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided and used some means of fall protection when landing materials on the second level of the new build hotel, thereby exposing employees to an approximate 11 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $980
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 C
- Issued
- May 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $980 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(c): "Retraining." When the employer has reason to believe that any affected employee who has already been trained does not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section, the employer shall retrain each such employee. Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where: 29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill. a) On the site, the employer did not ensure that employees performing the task of landing materials on the second level, by the hoisting area, were clear on the requirements for knowing when and/or what type of fall protection should have been used when working at heights greater than six feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $980
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Mauricio Martinez
View Mauricio Martinez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339742835.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.