Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NICHOLSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NICHOLSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. in 110 BAMBERG DRIVE, PELL CITY, AL 35125 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 339746067.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nicholson Manufacturing Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nicholson Manufacturing Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
110 BAMBERG DRIVE
City
PELL CITY
State
AL
ZIP
35125
Mailing
110 BAMBERG DRIVE, PELL CITY, AL 35125
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Sep 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,590 · Current $2,754 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:   (a) On or about 5/5/14 - Production, the welder was exposed to continuous noise at 198.1% of the allowable 8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 94.9 dBA.  The sampling was performed for 441 minutes during one shift on 5/5/14.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time of 39 minutes.   (b) On or about 5/5/14 - Production, the welder was exposed to continuous noise at 78.5% of the allowable 8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 88.5 dBA.  The sampling was performed for 463 minutes during one shift on 5/5/14.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time of 17 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2754
  • — Z (S) $4590

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Aug 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,295 · Current $1,377 Reduced

Hazardous substances 06892460SL07

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a)  On or about 4/28/14 - Facility, a written hazard communication program had not been developed for employees exposed to welding fumes, lubricants, fuels and paints.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1377
  • — Z (S) $2295

1910.1200 F06 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Aug 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(v):  (a)  On or about 4/28/14 - Fuel gas yard, the propane tank was not labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Aug 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    (a)  On or about 5/5/14 - Production area(s), employee(s) had not been provided specific information on their potential exposure to lubricants, welding fume, steel dust and paints in their working environment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 B05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Aug 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): Visible gauges or audible alarms or pressure activated devices were not installed to indicate or insure that the required air velocity is maintained:  (a)  On or about 4/28/14 - Facility, the spray booth, where solvent based paints were applied, was not equipped with an operable manometer or other equipment to assure velocity.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.107 B09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Jul 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 2037T185

29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction:  (a):  On or about 4/28/14 - Spray paint booth, residual containers of paints and combustible storage cabinets were stored next to the spray booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.107 E09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Aug 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 18102590

29 CFR 1910.107(e)(9): Flammable liquids for use in spraying operations were transferred from one container to another without both containers being effectively bonded and grounded to prevent discharge sparks of static electricity.  (a)  On or about 4/28/14 - Spray paint booth, bonding and grounding was not used when paints were transferred from metal container to spray equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.107 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 18102590

29 CFR 1910.107(g)(1): Spraying was conducted outside of predetermined spraying area(s):  a)  On or about 4/28/2014 - Facility, oversized parts were not moved into the spray booth but were painted outside in the area in front of the booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Aug 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  (a)  On or about 4/28/14 - Facility, the employer did not certify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Aug 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 06890731152016201840

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) On or about 4/28/14 - Production Areas, employees welding and painting were provided and required to use respirators such as the North 7700 half-mask respirator and 3M 8210 and 8212 face filtering respirators.  The employer had not developed a respirator program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Sep 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):  (a)  On or about 5/5/14 - Welding area, an employee was exposed to chromium (VI) at a time-weighted-average of 0.00046 mg/m3.  The employee was sampled for 420 minutes during one shift on 5/5/14.  Zero exposure was not assumed for the unsampled time of 60 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1026 I04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2014
Abate by
Aug 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1910.1026(i)(4)(i): Employees were allowed to consume food or beverages at a worksite where chromium (VI) was present; however, the employer did not ensure that the eating and drinking areas were maintained as free as practicable of chromium (VI):  (a) On or about 5/5/14 - Lunchroom, the presence of chromium(VI) was detected in a wipe sample taken from the lunchroom table.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Nicholson Manufacturing Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339746067.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.