PELL CITY, AL —
OSHA Inspection: NICHOLSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NICHOLSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. in 110 BAMBERG DRIVE, PELL CITY, AL 35125 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 339746067.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NICHOLSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 110 BAMBERG DRIVE
- City
- PELL CITY
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 35125
- Mailing
- 110 BAMBERG DRIVE, PELL CITY, AL 35125
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- Employees
- 22
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,590 · Current $2,754 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: (a) On or about 5/5/14 - Production, the welder was exposed to continuous noise at 198.1% of the allowable 8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 94.9 dBA. The sampling was performed for 441 minutes during one shift on 5/5/14. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time of 39 minutes. (b) On or about 5/5/14 - Production, the welder was exposed to continuous noise at 78.5% of the allowable 8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 88.5 dBA. The sampling was performed for 463 minutes during one shift on 5/5/14. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time of 17 minutes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2754
- — Z (S) $4590
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,295 · Current $1,377 Reduced
06892460SL07
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) On or about 4/28/14 - Facility, a written hazard communication program had not been developed for employees exposed to welding fumes, lubricants, fuels and paints.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1377
- — Z (S) $2295
1910.1200 F06 I
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(v): (a) On or about 4/28/14 - Fuel gas yard, the propane tank was not labeled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) On or about 5/5/14 - Production area(s), employee(s) had not been provided specific information on their potential exposure to lubricants, welding fume, steel dust and paints in their working environment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.107 B05 I
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): Visible gauges or audible alarms or pressure activated devices were not installed to indicate or insure that the required air velocity is maintained: (a) On or about 4/28/14 - Facility, the spray booth, where solvent based paints were applied, was not equipped with an operable manometer or other equipment to assure velocity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.107 B09
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
2037T185
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction: (a): On or about 4/28/14 - Spray paint booth, residual containers of paints and combustible storage cabinets were stored next to the spray booth.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.107 E09
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
18102590
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(9): Flammable liquids for use in spraying operations were transferred from one container to another without both containers being effectively bonded and grounded to prevent discharge sparks of static electricity. (a) On or about 4/28/14 - Spray paint booth, bonding and grounding was not used when paints were transferred from metal container to spray equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.107 G01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
18102590
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(1): Spraying was conducted outside of predetermined spraying area(s): a) On or about 4/28/2014 - Facility, oversized parts were not moved into the spray booth but were painted outside in the area in front of the booth.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: (a) On or about 4/28/14 - Facility, the employer did not certify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
06890731152016201840
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) On or about 4/28/14 - Production Areas, employees welding and painting were provided and required to use respirators such as the North 7700 half-mask respirator and 3M 8210 and 8212 face filtering respirators. The employer had not developed a respirator program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1026 D01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI): (a) On or about 5/5/14 - Welding area, an employee was exposed to chromium (VI) at a time-weighted-average of 0.00046 mg/m3. The employee was sampled for 420 minutes during one shift on 5/5/14. Zero exposure was not assumed for the unsampled time of 60 minutes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1026 I04 I
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(i)(4)(i): Employees were allowed to consume food or beverages at a worksite where chromium (VI) was present; however, the employer did not ensure that the eating and drinking areas were maintained as free as practicable of chromium (VI): (a) On or about 5/5/14 - Lunchroom, the presence of chromium(VI) was detected in a wipe sample taken from the lunchroom table.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Nicholson Manufacturing Company, INC.
View Nicholson Manufacturing Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339746067.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.