Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ARCADIA CONSTRUCTION INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of ARCADIA CONSTRUCTION INC. in 120 ONEIDA DRIVE, GREENWICH, CT 06830 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 339746273.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Arcadia Construction INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Arcadia Construction INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
120 ONEIDA DRIVE
City
GREENWICH
State
CT
ZIP
06830
Mailing
307 FOUR BROOKS ROAD, STAMFORD, CT 06903
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2014
Abate by
Jul 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  Jobsite: The employees, that were working on the fabricated frame scaffold were exposed to a fall hazard and were not protected from the fall hazard by the use of appropriate fall protection equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2014
Abate by
Jul 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Jobsite: The employees who were working on the roof were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2014
Abate by
Jul 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that all employees who performed work from the scaffold were trained by a qualified person in the hazards related to the scaffold and the procedures to control or minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2014
Abate by
Jul 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.  Jobsite: The employer did not have each employee involved in maintaining or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2014
Abate by
Jul 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Jobsite:  The employees who were exposed to fall hazard while working on the roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.602 C01 VI

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2014
Abate by
Jul 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi): Industrial truck(s) in use did not meet the applicable requirements of design, construction, stability, inspection, testing, maintenance, and operation, as defined in American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks.  Jobsite:   1. Employees were permitted to walk and work under a supported load on a telehandler, exposing themselves to a struck by hazard.  2. The operator of the Telehandler left the controls of the machine without fully lowering the load with the controls neutralized and the power shut off.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339746273.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.