Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: GENEVA BODY SHOP, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GENEVA BODY SHOP, INC. in 110 N. RADDANT ROAD, BATAVIA, IL 60510 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 339752214.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Geneva Body Shop, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Geneva Body Shop, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
110 N. RADDANT ROAD
City
BATAVIA
State
IL
ZIP
60510
Mailing
110 N. RADDANT ROAD, BATAVIA, IL 60510
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2014
Abate by
Jul 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):   A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about May 2nd, 2014:  Employees are required by the employer to wear an organic vapor half-facepiece respirator while painting in the spray booth. The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for this required use of respirators.  Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $840
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2014
Abate by
Jul 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):   The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about May 2nd, 2014:  Employees are required by the employer to wear an organic vapor half-facepiece respirator while painting in the spray booth. The employer did not provide medical evaluations to determine employees' ability to use a respirator.  Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2014
Abate by
Jul 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):   Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about May 2nd, 2014:  Employees are required by the employer to wear an organic vapor half-facepiece respirator while painting in the spray booth. The employer did not provide a fit test to an employee prior to the employee's initial use of the respirator.  Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2014
Abate by
Jul 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):   The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about May 2nd, 2014:  The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program. Employees use a variety of automotive chemicals such as but not limited to additives, aerosols, toners, cleaners, clearcoats, hardeners, primers, and reducers.  Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2014
Abate by
Jul 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):   Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about May 2nd, 2014:  The employer did not provide effective information and training on hazardous chemicals for employees at the time of their initial assignment. Employees use a variety of automotive chemicals such as but not limited to additives, aerosols, toners, cleaners, clearcoats, hardeners, primers, and reducers.  Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339752214.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.