Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PROPAK DEVELOPMENT, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PROPAK DEVELOPMENT, INC. in 43 STULTS RD., DAYTON, NJ 08810 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 339752578.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Propak Development, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Propak Development, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
43 STULTS RD.
City
DAYTON
State
NJ
ZIP
08810
Mailing
43 STULTS RD., DAYTON, NJ 08810
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
65
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Abate by
Jun 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Exits were locked or fastened preventing free escape from inside of the building:    a/ Propak/43 Stults Rd. Site: Warehouse. Exit door leading from a gated inventory storage area to the nearest exit in the warehouse was locked with a combination lock while an employee was in the gated area.    Observed on/or about 05/01/2014.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $1785
  • — C (S) $2975
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Abate by
Jun 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:     a/ Propak/43 Stults Rd. Site: Warehouse.  An eye wash facility was not immediately available for use where employees are required to check powered industrial truck battery fluid levels on a routine basis.      Observed on/or about 05/01/2014
Recent events (5)
  • — R (S) $1428
  • — I $1960
  • — C (S) $2380

1910.176 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(a): Aisle(s) or passageway(s) were not kept clear where mechanical handling equipment was used:     a/ Propak/43 Stults Rd. Site: Warehouse Packaging Area. Aisles where employees perform packaging operations at work stations were blocked by boxes, boxed product and a large trash container. Aisles were not maintained free of material in the event of a fire or other emergency.    Observed on/or about 05/01/2014
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $1428
  • — C (S) $2380
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Abate by
Jul 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).    a/ Propak/43 Stults Rd. Site: Warehouse.  Observed on/or about 05/01/2014    b/ Propak/113 Interstate Blvd. Site: Warehouse. Observed on/or about 05/09/2014    Forklift and mechanical hand jack operators who are required to drive forklift equipment in the main warehouse and the secondary warehouse were not provided with hands-on driving training in both warehouses.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $1428
  • — C (S) $2380
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by moving parts of compactor ram:    a/ Propak/43 Stults Rd. Site: Warehouse. Compactor - Walk-in Type (horizontal ram) was not provided with a guard and/or a constant pressure device to prevent accidental contact with moving ram during operation.            Observed on/or about 05/01/2014
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $1785
  • — C (S) $2975
  • — Z (S) $2975

View Propak Development, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339752578.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.