Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: HANOVER FOODS CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HANOVER FOODS CORPORATION in 7000 MILLINGTON ROAD, CLAYTON, DE 19938 (NAICS 311421). OSHA activity number 339755373.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hanover Foods Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hanover Foods Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7000 MILLINGTON ROAD
City
CLAYTON
State
DE
ZIP
19938
Mailing
P.O. BOX 1150, CLAYTON, DE 19938
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311421
Employees
96
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $3,600 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.22(c):  Covers and/or guardrails shall be provided to protect personnel from the hazards of open pits, tanks, vats, ditches, etc:    a) Lima Bean Washing Line - Employees were susceptible to fall injuries as multiple process drainage ditches were left uncovered, posing a tripping hazard.  Conditions observed on October 1, 2014.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $3600
  • · C (S) $6000
  • · Z (S) $6000

1910.28 A26

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $3,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(a)(26):  Scaffolds were not secured to permanent structures, through use of anchor bolts, reveal bolts, or other equivalent means:    a) Produce Freezing Line  Employees climbing ladder rungs on metal scaffolding for access to platforms adjacent to processes such as, but not limited to, produce freezing, were exposed to a fall hazard as the scaffolding, that was not secured to process equipment, had a tendency to tip over toward an employee climbing the ladder.  Condition observed on October 1, 2014.    Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, the employer must submit abatement certification, required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $3600
  • · C (S) $6000
  • · Z (S) $6000

1910.119 D03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 96 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2014
Abate by
Dec 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii):  The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices:  a) House Ammonia Engine Room - Employees were exposed to a potential ammonia exposure hazards as two roll-up doors, one with access to a hallway to the dock area and the other with access to the waffle area are not designed to close seal tight automatically.  Condition observed on April 23, 2014.  Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, the employer must submit abatement certification, required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.119 E03 V

Other-than-serious 1 instance 96 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2014
Abate by
Nov 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(v): The process hazard analysis did not address the hazards related to facility siting:     a) House Ammonia Engine Room - Employees were exposed to a potential ammonia exposure hazards as physical barricades or other protective engineering controls were not in place to protect the process equipment (ammonia vessel and piping), adjacent to compressor no. 9, running positioned alongside the forklift travel route to and from the waffle area, from damage and consequential ammonia release.  Condition observed on April 23, 2014.    Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, the employer must submit abatement certification, required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $1000
  • · C (S) $5000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.119 E05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 96 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2014
Abate by
Nov 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $2,100 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not establish a system to promptly address the process hazard analysis team's findings and recommendations; assure that the recommendations are resolved in a timely manner and that the resolution is documented:    a) Hanover Foods Corporation, Clayton, DE - Employees were exposed to hazards posed by a potential ammonia release in that recommendations such as, but not limited to, those listed below, were not resolved.  Conditions observed on April 23, 2014.     Unresolved Items    1. Purger equipment in the "House Engine Room" was not securely supported on the wall.  The weight of the purger pulling away from the wall could cause pipe connections to fall resulting in an ammonia release.    2. A leak detector in area of recirculator for CSA #2 was not installed to detect a potential ammonia leak from process connections in the hallway outside of CS #2 .    Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, the employer must submit abatement certification, required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $2100
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.119 J04 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 96 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2014
Abate by
Jan 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii):  Inspection and testing procedures did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices:  a) Hanover Foods Corporation, Clayton, DE - Employees were exposed to a potential ammonia exposure hazards as ammonia refrigeration process piping such as lengths of pipes under insulation were not inspected and tested in accordance with the American Petroleum Institute (API) and the International Institute of Ammonia Refrigeration (IIAR).  Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, the employer must submit abatement certification, required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.119 J06 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 96 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(6)(iii): The employer did not assure that maintenance materials, spare parts, and equipment were suitable for the process application for which they were used:  a) House Ammonia Engine Room - Employees were exposed to a potential ammonia exposure hazards as an undersized relief valve, rated for approximately 150 psi (instead of the correct rating of approximately 250 psi) was installed on the suction trap.  Consequently, this valve failed resulting in an ammonia release in July 2014.  Conditions identified on October 17, 2014.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.212 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a) Key Washer Final Wash Conveyor - Employees were exposed to a caught-by hazard posed by the end of an unguarded rotating motor conveyor shaft.  Condition observed on October 7, 2014.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1785
  • · C (S) $2550
  • · Z (S) $2550

1910.303 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2014
Abate by
Feb 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8870

29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2): Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more shall be guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means described in 1910.303(g)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D):         a)  480 Volt Electrical Equipment Cage Area - Covers were removed from 480 volt electrical cabinets and the cage area was not locked to prohibit unauthorized entry, exposing employees to an electrocution hazard from the unguarded live parts within the cage.  Condition observed on April 23, 2015.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $3000
  • · C (S) $5000
  • · Z (S) $5000

View Hanover Foods Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339755373.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.