Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: PARADISE HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of PARADISE HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC in 484 ANSON STREET, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06606 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 339756629.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Paradise Home Improvement LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Paradise Home Improvement LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
484 ANSON STREET
City
BRIDGEPORT
State
CT
ZIP
06606
Mailing
105 HOFFMAN STREET, TORRINGTON, CT 06790
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2014
Abate by
Jul 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)     Jobsite: The employer did not initiate and maintain programs so that a competent person could onduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite, materials and equipment to be able to identify and correct fall protection hazards as required.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1100
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2014
Abate by
Jul 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b)      Jobsite:  The employees who were working on the roof were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.502 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2014
Abate by
Jul 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2): The employer did not provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for employee(s) and did not comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before employee(s) began the work that necessitates the fall protection.  Jobsite:  The employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working on the roof were not provided with any fall protection equipment and it was not installed prior to the employees exposure to the fall hazards
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2014
Abate by
Jul 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Jobsite:  The employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working on the roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.552 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2014
Abate by
Jul 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with the manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators.           Jobsite: The RGC Pro 225 material hoist that was used by employees to gain access to the roof  was not designed to be used in such a manner.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1100
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339756629.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.