Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: KILAR FABRICATION, INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KILAR FABRICATION, INC in 2616 N. MAIN ST, HUBBARD, OH 44425 (NAICS 336211). OSHA activity number 339757007.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Kilar Fabrication, INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kilar Fabrication, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2616 N. MAIN ST
City
HUBBARD
State
OH
ZIP
44425
Mailing
2616 N. MAIN ST, HUBBARD, OH 44425
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336211
Employees
22
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2014
Abate by
Jul 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks:  At the time of inspection, the employer did not provide a training program to employees, in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks including, but not limited to the Clark C500-30 fork truck.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2014
Abate by
Jul 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition:  At the time of inspection, the Clark 500-30 fork truck had badly damaged tires and was not taken out of service.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2014
Abate by
Jul 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  At the time of inspection, the employer did not examine/inspect the Powered industrial vehicles, including but not limited to the Clark 500-30 fork truck. The fork truck had badly worn tires.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.179 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2014
Abate by
Jul 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): Overhead cranes were not inspected for defects on a daily basis for items including but not limited to; all functional operating mechanisms for maladjustment, deterioration or leakage of air or hydraulic systems and hooks:  At the time of inspection, the employer did not ensure each employee operating an overhead crane conducted frequent inspections prior to use. Cranes were operated a few times a week and no inspections were conducted by operators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2014
Abate by
Jul 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months:  At the time of inspection, the employer did not ensure a complete periodic inspection was conducted on overhead crane.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.179 L01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2014
Abate by
Jul 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(1): A preventive maintenance program based on the crane manufacturer's recommendations was not established:  At the time of inspection, the employer did not implement a preventative maintenance program for the overhead crane based on the manufacturers recommendations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.184 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2014
Abate by
Jul 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(1): Alloy steel sling(s) did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach:  On March 7, 2013, the employer did not ensure that alloy steel chain slings had permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.38 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2014
Abate by
Jul 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(a): The employer did not establish a written emergency evacuation plan for employees expected to evacuate in the event of a fire or other emergency.  At the time of inspection, the employer did not establish an emergency evacuation plan when the employees are expected to evacuate the facility in the event of a fire.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339757007.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.