Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: 3D SYSTEMS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of 3D SYSTEMS in 3375 BARBER ROAD, BARBERTON, OH 44203 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 339758476.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch 3D Systems — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for 3D Systems is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
3D SYSTEMS
Site address
3375 BARBER ROAD
City
BARBERTON
State
OH
ZIP
44203
Mailing
3375 BARBER ROAD, BARBERTON, OH 44203
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
24
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii):The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a power industrial truck:     On or about May 7, 2014, the employer failed to ensure employees operating the Toyota propane forklift, model number 8FGCU25, serial number 43760 were trained prior to allowing operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):     a. On or about May 7, 2011, the employer failed to ensure employees operating winder number 12 were protected against accidental contact with the pulley system while working near the pulleys.    b. On or about May 7, 2011, the employer failed to ensure employees operating winder number 8 were protected against accidental contact with the pulley system while working near the pulleys.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about May 7, 2014, the employer failed to have a written Hazard Communication program. Employees work with Acetone and Propane.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about May 7, 2014, the employer failed to train employees on the hazards of chemicals they use in their job such as, but not limited to, Acetone and Propane.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.38 B

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:  On or about May 7, 2014, the employer failed to have a written emergency action plan in place
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2014
Abate by
Aug 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:   On or about May 7, 2014, the employer failed to certify a personal protective equipment (PPE) audit was performed to ensure employees were protected by proper PPE while performing work with plastic extrusion equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339758476.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.