HO HO KUS, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: GLEN W. BERGER, M.D., P.A.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GLEN W. BERGER, M.D., P.A. in 110 WARREN AVENUE, SUITE 5, HO HO KUS, NJ 07423 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 339759003.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GLEN W. BERGER, M.D., P.A.
- Site address
- 110 WARREN AVENUE, SUITE 5
- City
- HO HO KUS
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07423
- Mailing
- 110 WARREN AVENUE, SUITE 5, HO HO KUS, NJ 07423
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621111
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: a) Facility: Employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens during routine duties such as, but not limited to, centrifuging of blood specimens, decontamination of surgical sharp instruments and countertops, administer of flu vaccination, insulin injection, assistance with biopsy/incision procedures, and handling of blood specimens, and affected employees had not been included in a written bloodborne pathogens program, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.1030 G02 I
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program: a) Facility: Employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens as part of their routine duties, including, but not limited to, centrifuging of blood specimens, decontamination of surgical sharp instruments and countertops, administer of flu vaccination, insulin injection, assistance with biopsy/incision procedures, and handling of blood specimens, and had not completed initial training, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1030 C01 V
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v): The employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control Plan, did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control plan: a) Facility: Employees have exposure to blood and other potentially infectious material in the course of their work, and annual solicitation to identify, evaluate and selection of effective engineering controls and work practices from the employees was not documented, thus potentially exposing employees to bloodborne pathogens, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.1030 D02 I
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employees exposure: a) Facility: The employer did not provide suitable engineering controls that would eliminate or minimize exposure to blood and other potentially infectious material and identify engineering controls, such as, but not limited to, self-sheathing needles, retractable syringe, and needleless devices, when such devices are safer and commercially available, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D04 III A2III
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(2)(iii): During use, containers for contaminated sharps were not replaced routinely or were allowed to be overfilled: a) Patient Examining Rooms: Sharp containers used for disposal of syringe needles, were allowed to overfill, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Facility: A written hazard communication program was not maintained at the workplace where employees worked with hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to, Citri Guard II disinfectant/cleaner, and broad spectrum quaternary disinfectant cleaner, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Facility: Employees worked with hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to, Citri Guard II disinfectant/cleaner, and broad spectrum quaternary disinfectant cleaner, and were not provided with training covering the health effects and methods by which employees can protect themselves from the hazards, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621111)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339759003.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.