Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: GLEN W. BERGER, M.D., P.A.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GLEN W. BERGER, M.D., P.A. in 110 WARREN AVENUE, SUITE 5, HO HO KUS, NJ 07423 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 339759003.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Glen W. Berger, M.D., P.A. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Glen W. Berger, M.D., P.A. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
110 WARREN AVENUE, SUITE 5
City
HO HO KUS
State
NJ
ZIP
07423
Mailing
110 WARREN AVENUE, SUITE 5, HO HO KUS, NJ 07423
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621111
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2014
Abate by
Sep 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    a) Facility: Employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens during routine duties such as, but not limited to, centrifuging of blood specimens, decontamination of surgical sharp instruments and countertops, administer of flu vaccination, insulin injection, assistance with biopsy/incision procedures, and handling of blood specimens, and affected employees had not been included in a written bloodborne pathogens program, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1030 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2014
Abate by
Sep 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program:    a) Facility: Employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogens as part of their routine duties, including, but not limited to, centrifuging of blood specimens, decontamination of surgical sharp instruments and countertops, administer of flu vaccination, insulin injection, assistance with biopsy/incision procedures, and handling of blood specimens, and had not completed initial training, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1030 C01 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2014
Abate by
Aug 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v): The employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control Plan, did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control plan:    a) Facility: Employees have exposure to blood and other potentially infectious material in the course of their work, and annual solicitation to identify, evaluate and selection of effective engineering controls and work practices from the employees was not documented, thus potentially exposing employees to bloodborne pathogens, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1030 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2014
Abate by
Aug 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employees exposure:  a) Facility: The employer did not provide suitable engineering controls that would eliminate or minimize exposure to blood and other potentially infectious material and identify engineering controls, such as, but not limited to, self-sheathing needles, retractable syringe, and needleless devices, when such devices are safer and commercially available, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1030 D04 III A2III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(2)(iii): During use, containers for contaminated sharps were not replaced routinely or were allowed to be overfilled:    a) Patient Examining Rooms: Sharp containers used for disposal of syringe needles, were allowed to overfill, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2014
Abate by
Aug 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) Facility: A written hazard communication program was not maintained at the workplace where employees worked with hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to, Citri Guard II disinfectant/cleaner, and broad spectrum quaternary disinfectant cleaner, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2014
Abate by
Aug 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Facility: Employees worked with hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to, Citri Guard II disinfectant/cleaner, and broad spectrum quaternary disinfectant cleaner, and were not provided with training covering the health effects and methods by which employees can protect themselves from the hazards, on or about 5/12/14 and 5/30/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339759003.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.