MARINETTE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: BAY AREA PROPERTIES, INC.
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of BAY AREA PROPERTIES, INC. in W1424 HWY 41, MARINETTE, WI 54143 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 339759748.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BAY AREA PROPERTIES, INC.
- Site address
- W1424 HWY 41
- City
- MARINETTE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54143
- Mailing
- 5710 MONTEVIDEO LANE, ABRAMS, WI 54101
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) On or about 5-6-14, an employee who was rigging house sections from a roof surface was within three (3) ft. of overhead spreader bars and within the fall zone without utilizing head protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.102 A02
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2): Eye and face protective equipment being used did not meet the requirements specified in Z 87.1-1968: a) On or about 5-6-14, an employee who had been cutting a manufactured house into sections was operating an electric Sawzall reciprocating saw without utilizing ANSI approved safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.403 B01 I
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1)(i): Safety of equipment was not determined on the basis of suitability of the equipment for an identified purpose as evidenced by listing, labeling, or certification for that identified purpose: On or about 5-6-14, an employee who was operating a Sawzall reciprocating saw on a roof surface was using an indoor use only extension cord as electric power feed to an extension cord for the saw.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.404 B01 I
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites: a) On or about 5-6-14, an employee who was using electric power from an outdoor subpanel had plugged in a hard use 14 ga. extension cord into an indoor-use only extension cord used as a branch circuit power outlet without ground fault protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 G02 III
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not used in continuous lengths without splice or tap: a) On or about 5-6-14, an employee who was operating a Sawzall reciprocating saw was utilizing a spliced 14 ga. extension cord.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means: a) On or about 5-6-14, an employee who was using electric power from an outdoor subpanel box without a dead front installed was within one (1) foot of unprotected live parts when utilizing a flexible cord, branch circuit's power outlet, which was directly wired into the panel with the outlet positioned hanging over the top of the box in front of the panel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about 5-6-14, an employee who had been cutting a house into sections and rigging the section to a crane was working from a 5:12 pitch roof surface with an eave edge of ten and one half (10.5) feet above compacted surface without utilizing fall protection equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.503 A02 VIII
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(viii): The employer did not assure that each employee had been trained by a competent person qualified in the standards contained in subpart M: a) On or about 5-6-14, employer did not provide required employee fall protection safety training for an employee who did not associate fall from elevation hazards when working at heights greater than six feet without utilizing fall protection equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339759748.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.