Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: SUN LODGING, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SUN LODGING, INC. in 3002 MILWAUKEE ROAD, BELOIT, WI 53511 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 339763096.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch SUN Lodging, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SUN Lodging, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SUN LODGING, INC.
Site address
3002 MILWAUKEE ROAD
City
BELOIT
State
WI
ZIP
53511
Mailing
3002 MILWAUKEE ROAD, BELOIT, WI 53511
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
8
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2014
Abate by
Oct 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.    The employer failed to certify the abatement of the following cited items:    a) Electrical receptacles used to energize electrical tools were not rated for outdoor use.    b) Electrical cords were not inspected nor was there a ground fault circuit interrupter used for employees when using electrical tools.    c) Outdoor extension cords used to energize electrical hand tools were missing ground prongs.    d) Employer did not assess silica exposures when the employees were required to remove old stucco and cut cement board containing silica.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $400

1926.403 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2014
Abate by
Jul 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification:     Employees used electrical receptacles, to energize electrical tools, that were not rated for outdoor use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2014
Abate by
Jul 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites.  Employer did not inspect the electrical cords nor had a ground fault circuit interrupters for employees to utilize when utilizing electrical tools.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2014
Abate by
Jul 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous: Outdoor electrical extension cords, used to energize electrical hand tools, were missing the ground prong
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 11, 2014
Abate by
Aug 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form: Employees silica exposure was not assessed when they removed old stucco and cut cement board containing silica.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339763096.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.