STAMFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: EL DAN CORPORATION
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of EL DAN CORPORATION in 28 HIGH VALLEY WAY, STAMFORD, CT 06903 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339763419.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EL DAN CORPORATION
- Site address
- 28 HIGH VALLEY WAY
- City
- STAMFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06903
- Mailing
- 7 SLEEPY HOLLOW ROAD, PORT CHESTER, NY 10573
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: The employees, engaged in residential activities from the deck were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.502 A02
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2): The employer did not provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for employee(s) and did not comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before employee(s) began the work that necessitates the fall protection. Jobsite: The employer did not provide and install appropriate fall protection equipment to protect employees from fall hazards prior to removing the guardrails installed on the open-sided deck.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees who were exposed fall hazards of up to 10 feet 5 inches above the ground while working on the rear deck were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339763419.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.