PROVIDENCE, RI —
OSHA Inspection: JEWEL CASE CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JEWEL CASE CORPORATION in 110 DUPONT DR, PROVIDENCE, RI 02907 (NAICS 322212). OSHA activity number 339763971.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JEWEL CASE CORPORATION
- Site address
- 110 DUPONT DR
- City
- PROVIDENCE
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02907
- Mailing
- 110 DUPONT DR, PROVIDENCE, RI 02907
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 322212
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- May 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts: (a) Tool room: The rotating chuck of the Clausing 1500 and South Bend lathes were not provided with an adequate guard or guarding device, on or about 5-12-14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- May 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposed an employee to injury, was not guarded: (a) Production area: The points of operation of the Wrapper machines were not guarded by an adequate guard or guarding device, on or about 5-12-14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.217 C01 I
- Issued
- May 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i): The employer did not provide and ensure the usage of point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power press(es): (a) Production area: The point of operation on the Piercing machines in use at the facility were not guarded by any point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices, on or about 5-12-14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.213 C01
- Issued
- May 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(1): Circular handfed ripsaw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut: (a) Manufacturing area: The Hitachi C10RA3 tablesaw was not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut, on or about 5-12-14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.213 C02
- Issued
- May 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(2): Hand-fed circular ripsaw(s) were not furnished with a spreader to prevent material from squeezing the saw or being thrown back on the operator: (a) Manufacturing area: The Hitachi C10RA3 tablesaw was not furnished with a spreader to prevent material from squeezing the saw or being thrown back on the operator, on or about 5-12-14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.213 C03
- Issued
- May 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(3): Hand-fed ripsaw(s) did not have non kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator: (a) Manufacturing area: The Hitachi C10RA3 tablesaw did not have non kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator, on or about 5-12-14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- May 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one-fourth inch: (a) Tool room: The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue at the top of the Baldor pedestal grinder was five-eighths inch on the left and right sides, and thus exceeded one-fourth inch, on or about 5-12-14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- May 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel: (a) Tool room: The Diehl pedestal grinder did not have an adjustable tongue guard, and thus was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel, on or about 5-12-14.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Jewel Case Corporation
View Jewel Case Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 322212)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339763971.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.