Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: ASPEN IMAGING, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ASPEN IMAGING, LLC in 3300 KINGWOOD ST, HOUSTON, TX 77092 (NAICS 323110). OSHA activity number 339764508.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aspen Imaging, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aspen Imaging, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ASPEN IMAGING, LLC
Site address
3300 KINGWOOD ST
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77092
Mailing
3300 KINGWOOD ST, HOUSTON, TX 77092
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323110
Employees
35
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jun 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).    The employer failed to access the workplace to determine if hazards were present, which would necessitate the use of personal protective equipment.  This violation was observed on or about May 12, 2014 and at times prior thereto where employees were exposed to chemical hazards without the protection of personal protective equipment.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all employees use protection of personal protective equipment when there is a chemical hazard present.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jun 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative.    The employer does not provide employees with a program entailing energy control procedures, training, and periodic inspections for conducting lockout/tagout activities when performing services or maintenance on the Man Roland 704 presses. This violation occurred on or about May 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, in the shop where authorized and affected personnel were exposed to electrical and crushed-by hazards without energy control procedures, training, and periodic inspections for the isolation of hazardous energy.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jun 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.    The employer failed to provide and ensure suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body within the work area for immediate emergency use.  This violation was observed on or about May 12, 2014 and at times prior thereto throughout the press and pre-press areas of the shop where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials when filling presses with chemicals without suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all employees are provided suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body when exposed to corrosive materials hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2450
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jun 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace.  The employer does not maintain and make readily accessible copies of safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace. This violation occurred on or about May 12, 2014, at printing press  and pre-press areas, where employees were using chemicals such as, but not limited to, Prisco 2451 Plus 2 Fountain Solution, Ink Anti-Skin No Wash-up Spray, and Wash V-60, without maintaining copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that safety data sheets are maintained and made available to employees on all work shifts for all hazardous chemicals in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 2 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jun 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information.  The employer does not provide the update training according with the revised Hazard Communication Standard. This violation occurred on or about May 12, 2014, and at times prior thereto, when employees in the facility were required to handle hazardous chemicals without being trained on how to identify the hazard associated to those chemicals according with the revised Hazard Communication Standard.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all employees are trained on all hazards in their work area according with the revised Hazard Communication Standard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339764508.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.