PORT WASHINGTON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: ALLEN EDMONDS CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALLEN EDMONDS CORPORATION in 3820 HWY KW, PORT WASHINGTON, WI 53074 (NAICS 321999). OSHA activity number 339768327.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALLEN EDMONDS CORPORATION
- Site address
- 3820 HWY KW
- City
- PORT WASHINGTON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53074
- Mailing
- 201 E. SEVEN HILLS RD., PORT WASHINGTON, WI 53074
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321999
- Employees
- 104
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: (a) The employer did not develop energy control procedures for new equipment (such as but not limited to: Leadermac Molder) not covered by the documented energy control procedures. This exposed employees to accidental restart/inadvertent restart of equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.212 A02
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $6,000 · Current $3,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2): Guard(s) on machine(s) were not affixed to the machine or secured elsewhere when attachment to the machine was not possible: (a) In the Woodlore Area, the AET had guards which were easily removed by sliding out of the frame. This exposed employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3600
- — Z (S) $6000
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein: (a) In the Recraft Area, a safety container filled with MEK was not properly labeled. No chemical name was visible and the hazard warning numbers were barely legible. (b) In the Handsewn Area, a safety container filled with MEK was not properly labeled. No chemical name or hazard warning numbers was visible.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $15,000 · Current $9,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): (a) In the Handsewn Area, a Herbert Jaffe, Inc. tassel machine (Needle: 134_33D) had an opening greater than 1/4" between the needle and shoe exposing employees to struck-by hazards. The Allen Edmonds Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 111363, citation number1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on November 13, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 3820 Highway KW, Port Washington, WI.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $9000
- — Z (R) $15000
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: (a) The employer had not accomplished a periodic inspection of the lockout / tagout procedures. Accomplishing a review of lockout tagout procedures ensures continuity of procedures and proper application. Inadequate review of changes to equipment and machinery can lead to improper lockout.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1030 C01 IV
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated when necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures which affect occupational exposure and to reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure: (a) The employer had a written bloodborne pathogens program revised 6/1/12 which was not reviewed at least annually and revised when personnel changed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1030 G02 II B
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(B): The employer did not ensure that the training was provided to employees with occupational exposure at least annually: (a) The employer was providing bloodborne pathogens training 2 years ago to those designated First Responders.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: (a) The employer did not provide training to employees regarding the safety data sheet (section order and type of information contained within each section) and labeling (pictograms and signal words).
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Allen Edmonds Corporation
View Allen Edmonds Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321999)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339768327.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.