Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALLEN EDMONDS CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALLEN EDMONDS CORPORATION in 3820 HWY KW, PORT WASHINGTON, WI 53074 (NAICS 321999). OSHA activity number 339768327.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Allen Edmonds Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Allen Edmonds Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3820 HWY KW
City
PORT WASHINGTON
State
WI
ZIP
53074
Mailing
201 E. SEVEN HILLS RD., PORT WASHINGTON, WI 53074
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321999
Employees
104
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2014
Abate by
Sep 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    (a)  The employer did not develop energy control procedures for new equipment (such as but not limited to:  Leadermac Molder) not covered by the documented energy control procedures.  This exposed employees to accidental restart/inadvertent restart of equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.212 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2014
Abate by
Sep 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $3,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2): Guard(s) on machine(s) were not affixed to the machine or secured elsewhere when attachment to the machine was not possible:    (a)  In the Woodlore Area, the AET had guards which were easily removed by sliding out of the frame.  This exposed employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3600
  • — Z (S) $6000

1910.1200 F05

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2014
Abate by
Sep 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:    (a)  In the Recraft Area, a safety container filled with MEK was not properly labeled.  No chemical name was visible and the hazard warning numbers were barely legible.    (b)  In the Handsewn Area, a safety container filled with MEK was not properly labeled.  No chemical name or hazard warning numbers was visible.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.212 A03 II

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2014
Abate by
Sep 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $15,000 · Current $9,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    (a) In the Handsewn Area, a Herbert Jaffe, Inc. tassel machine (Needle:  134_33D) had an opening greater than 1/4" between the needle and shoe exposing employees to struck-by hazards.      The Allen Edmonds Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 111363, citation number1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on November 13, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 3820 Highway KW, Port Washington, WI.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $9000
  • — Z (R) $15000

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2014
Abate by
Sep 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  (a)  The employer had not accomplished a periodic inspection of the lockout / tagout procedures.  Accomplishing a review of lockout tagout procedures ensures continuity of procedures and proper application.  Inadequate review of changes to equipment and machinery can lead to improper lockout.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1030 C01 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2014
Abate by
Sep 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated when necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures which affect occupational exposure and to reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure:  (a)  The employer had a written bloodborne pathogens program revised 6/1/12 which was not reviewed at least annually and revised when personnel changed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1030 G02 II B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2014
Abate by
Sep 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(B): The employer did not ensure that the training was provided to employees with occupational exposure at least annually:  (a)  The employer was providing bloodborne pathogens training 2 years ago to those designated First Responders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 93 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2014
Abate by
Sep 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:   (a)  The employer did not provide training to employees regarding the safety data sheet (section order and type of information contained within each section) and labeling (pictograms and signal words).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Allen Edmonds Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339768327.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.