HOUSTON, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: GRETNA MACHINE SHOP, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GRETNA MACHINE SHOP, INC. in 8422 BASCOM ST, HOUSTON, TX 77080 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 339769531.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GRETNA MACHINE SHOP, INC.
- Site address
- 8422 BASCOM ST
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77080
- Mailing
- 8422 BASCOM ST, HOUSTON, TX 77080
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer does not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from the recognized hazards of being struck-by which are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lbs. pedestal jib crane at or near CNC Lathe 9 without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. b. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lbs pedestal jib crane at or near CNC Lathe 25 without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. c. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lbs. pedestal jib crane at or near CNC Lathe 27 without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. d. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lbs. wall-supported jib crane at or near CNC Lathe 29B without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. e. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lbs. wall-supported jib crane at or near CNC Lathe 11A without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. f. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lbs. pedestal jib crane at or near CNC Mills 25, 6, & 5A without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. g. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lbs. wall-supported jib crane at or near CNC Lathes 29A & 30 without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. h. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lbs. pedestal jib crane at or near CNC Mills 11B & 11C without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. i. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lbs. wall-supported jib crane at or near CNC Lathe 4B without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. j. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lb. beam-supported overhead crane at or near CNC Lathe 5B without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. k. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lb. beam-supported overhead crane at or near CNC Lathe 4C without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. l. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lb. beam-supported overhead crane inside the QC room without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. m. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lb. beam-supported jib crane at or near CNC Mill 10A without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. n. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lb. pedestal jib crane at or near a Doosan CNC Mill, S/N MV0010-002300, without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. o. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 1500-lb. pedestal jib crane at or near CNC Mill 2B without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. p. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lb. pedestal jib crane at or near CNC Mill 2A without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. q. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lb. pedestal jib crane at or near the de-burr table without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. r. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lb. pedestal jib crane at or near CNC Mill 10B without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. s. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, between Building G-2 and G-3 where employees in the Band saw area were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 1000-lb. pedestal jib crane without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. t. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-3 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lb. pedestal jib crane without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. u. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-4 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lb. pedestal jib crane at or between CNC Mill 3A & 3B without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. v. This violation was observed on or about May 15, 2014, in Building G-4 where employees were exposed to being struck-by loads lifted with a 500-lb. pedestal jib crane at or near CNC Mill 3C without an annual inspection being conducted and records maintained. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation describing the actions it is taking to ensure that employees are not exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $4200
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: The employer does not develop, document and utilize procedures for the control of potentially hazard energy. a. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Okuma MC-60VAE CNC Mill #9 without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. b. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Okuma LB25 CNC Lathe #25, S/N 9411, without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. c. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Okuma LB35II CNC Lathe #27 without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. d. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Okuma LNC10 CNC Lathe #29B without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. e. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Daewoo DMV 3016L Mill #11A without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. f. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Okuma LB25 CNC Lathe #25, S/N 0503, without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. g. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Puma 300C CNC Lathe #6 without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. h. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Puma 300L CNC lathe #5A without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. i. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Okuma OSP-U10L CNC Lathe #30 without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. j. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Okuma OSP-U10L CNC Lathe #29A without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. k. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Puma 400B CNC Lathe #4A without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. l. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Daewoo DMV 3016 CNC Mill #11B without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. m. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Daewoo DMV 3016 CNC Mill #11C without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. n. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Puma 400B CNC lathe #4B without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. o. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Puma 300L CNC Lathe #5B without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. p. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Puma 280 CNC Lathe #7 without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. q. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Puma 400B CNC Lathe #4C without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. r. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Daewoo DMV 4020 CNC Mill #10A without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. s. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Doosan 500II CNC Mill, S/N MV0010-002300 without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. t. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Puma 480XL CNC Mill #2B without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. u. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Puma 800L CNC Lathe #1 without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. v. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Puma 480XL CNC Mill #2A without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. w. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Doosan MV 4020 CNC Mill #10B without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. x. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in the maintenance area between Building G-2 and G-3 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing servicing/maintenance on a Trajan 20 Band Saw without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. y. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in the maintenance area between Building G-2 and G-3 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing servicing/maintenance on a HEM H90A-B/F Band Saw, S/N 597898 without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. z. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in the maintenance area between Building G-2 and G-3 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing servicing/maintenance on a HEM H90A-1 Band Saw, S/N 915305 without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. aa. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-3 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Vanguard Manual Lathe, Model CA6266C, S/N A40719295, without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. bb. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-3 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Mori Seiki Manual Lathe without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. cc. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-3 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Kingston Manual Lathe, Model CH93928, without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. dd. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-3 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Shenyang Manual Lathe, Model CA6266C, S/N A40801563, without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. ee. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-4 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Warner & Swasey 2-A Manual Lathe without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. ff. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-4 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Puma 400L CNC Lathe #3A without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. gg. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-4 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Puma 400L CNC Lathe #3B without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. hh. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-4 where employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when engaged in servicing/maintenance activities including setting up a Puma 400 CNC Lathe #3C without procedures developed, documented and utilized to control potentially hazardous energy. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that procedures are developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: The employer does not provide one or method of guarding to protect operators from machine hazards. a. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating an Okuma LB25 CNC Lathe #25, S/N 9411, without an operating interlock. b. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating an Okuma LB35II CNC Lathe #27 without an operating interlock. c. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating Okuma LNC10 CNC Lathe #29B without an operating interlock. d. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Daewoo DMV 3016L Mill #11A without an operating interlock. e. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating an Okuma LB25 CNC Lathe #25, S/N 0503, without an operating interlock. f. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Puma 300C CNC Lathe #6 without an operating interlock. g. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Puma 300L CNC lathe #5A without an operating interlock. h. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating an Okuma OSP-U10L CNC Lathe #30 without an operating interlock. i. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating an Okuma OSP-U10L CNC Lathe #29A without an operating interlock. j. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Puma 400B CNC Lathe #4A without an operating interlock. k. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Daewoo DMV 3016 CNC Mill #11B without an operating interlock. l. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-1 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Daewoo DMV 3016 CNC Mill #11C without an operating interlock. m. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Puma 400B CNC lathe #4B without an operating interlock. n. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Puma 300L CNC Lathe #5B without an operating interlock. o. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Puma 280 CNC Lathe #7 without an operating interlock. p. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-2 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Puma 400B CNC Lathe #4C without an operating interlock. q. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-4 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Puma 400 CNC Lathe #3A without an operating interlock. r. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-4 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Puma 400 CNC Lathe #3B without an operating interlock. s. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-4 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Puma 400 CNC Lathe #3C without an operating interlock. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that one or more methods of machine guarding is provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposed an employee to injury, was not guarded: The employer does not guard the point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury. a. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-3 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Bridgeport Mill without a point of operation guard. b. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-3 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Wells Index Mill, Model 047, SN 19332, without a point of operation guard. c. This violation occurred on or about May 15, 2014, and times prior thereto, in Building G-3 where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Wells Index Mill, Model 047, SN 22064, without a point of operation guard. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that the point of operation of machines whose operation exposed an employee to injury are guarded.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1750
- · Z (S) $3500
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339769531.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.