MILFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: CONSORTIUM HOLDING GROUP, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CONSORTIUM HOLDING GROUP, INC. in 1 CONNECTICUT TURNPIKE EAST, MILFORD, CT 06460 (NAICS 722211). OSHA activity number 339773533.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CONSORTIUM HOLDING GROUP, INC.
- Site address
- 1 CONNECTICUT TURNPIKE EAST
- City
- MILFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06460
- Mailing
- 1 CONNECTICUT TURNPIKE EAST, MILFORD, CT 06460
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 722211
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: ESTABLISHMENT: The employee lifting hot pots and pans from the stove or oven, had used one oven mitt and one towel.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): ESTABLISHMENT: The employer had not performed a Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine the necessity and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: ESTABLISHMENT: The employees, required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) were not trained in the Workplace Hazard Assessment pertaining to the use and maintenance of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not provide information and training on Hazard Communication program to employees who were required to work with and handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Bleach.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 722211)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339773533.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.