NEEDHAM, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: BROOKLINE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BROOKLINE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION in 50 DEDHAM AVENUE, NEEDHAM, MA 02492 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 339777609.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BROOKLINE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
- Site address
- 50 DEDHAM AVENUE
- City
- NEEDHAM
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02492
- Mailing
- 93 FISHER AVENUE, BROOKLINE, MA 02445
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236116
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $440 · Current $440
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: The Employer did not furnish the abatement required for the Citation issued within 10 calendar days, nor did they respond to the written request for abatement certification which was sent April 24, 2015.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $440
1926.403 B02
- Issued
- Oct 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,080 · Current $1,540 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification: Job site: Temporary power on a column at the rear of the building. The electrical cabinet was a NEMA Type 1 enclosure. It was not approved for outdoor use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1540
- · Z (S) $3080
1926.404 B01 II
- Issued
- Oct 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,760 · Current $880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii): On a construction site, where an assured equipment grounding program was not utilized, all 120-volt, single-phase, 15 and 20 ampere receptacle outlets which were not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and which are in use by employees did not have approved ground fault circuit interrupters for personal protection. Jobsite: Temporary power on a column at the rear of the building. Ground fault circuit interrupter protection was not provided on electrical circuits.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $880
- · Z (S) $1760
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,080 · Current $1,540 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: Penthouse roof Employees were exposed to fall hazards of up to approximately 46 feet while working on the roof.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1540
- · Z (S) $3080
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,200 · Current $1,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employer did not provide fall protection training for its employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1100
- · Z (S) $2200
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Oct 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. Jobsite: The employer has no fall protection training certification records for employees exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections at Brookline Development Corporation
View Brookline Development Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236116)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339777609.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.