WATERFORD, WI —
OSHA Inspection: BURGER KING CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BURGER KING CORPORATION in 2723 BECK DRIVE, WATERFORD, WI 53185 (NAICS 722513). OSHA activity number 339782328.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BURGER KING CORPORATION
- Site address
- 2723 BECK DRIVE
- City
- WATERFORD
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53185
- Mailing
- 2723 BECK DRIVE, WATERFORD, WI 53185
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 722513
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": a) The door by the drive through was not provided with an "EXIT" sign to identify a means of egress from the facility in the event of an emergency such as fire.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1785
- — Z (S) $2550
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): Where the employer has provided portable fire extinguishers for employee use in the workplace, the employer shall also provide an educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting. a) The company had not provided information and training to employees regarding the proper use of fire extinguisher equipment available to extinguish incipient stage fires.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1785
- — Z (S) $2550
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries: a) The portable fire extinguisher in the northwest corner of the kitchen preparation area was obstructed by a garbage can, fan and cart to prevent use if required for an emergency.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: a) The electrical junction box where the light fixture was removed in the freezer was lacking a plug to effectively close the fixture.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: a) The company had not obtained or maintained a material safety data sheet for chemicals obtained from local sources such as "Pine Glo" cleaner used in the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a) The company had not provided employees exposed to chemicals information and training on the safety data sheets or labeling with pictograms required by Global Harmonization System (GHS) for chemicals used including but not limited to degreaser, sanitizer and detergent.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Burger King Corporation
View Burger King Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 722513)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339782328.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.