Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FLEET EQUIPMENT CENTER, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FLEET EQUIPMENT CENTER, INC. in 555 E SOUTH FRONTAGE RD., BOLINGBROOK, IL 60440 (NAICS 532120). OSHA activity number 339785339.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fleet Equipment Center, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fleet Equipment Center, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
555 E SOUTH FRONTAGE RD.
City
BOLINGBROOK
State
IL
ZIP
60440
Mailing
555 E SOUTH FRONTAGE RD., BOLINGBROOK, IL 60440
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
532120
Employees
33
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer must establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily is medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator is cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user. Exception: Employers are not required to include in a written respiratory protection program those employees whose only use of respirators involves the voluntary use of filtering facepieces (dust masks).  a. On or about May 29, 2014, at the above located workplace, employees wore 3M 5300 half mask respirators during spray painting and decal removal operations. The employees were not medically evaluated or trained. The employer did not provide the information in Appendix D to the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.  a. On or about May 29, 2014, at the above located workplace, employees cleaning parts were exposed to the hazards associated with chemicals such as, but not limited to mineral spirits. These hazards necessitated the use of personal protective equipment such as safety glasses and gloves to prevent occupational injuries or illnesses. The employer had not verified, through written certification, that a hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:  a. On or about May 29 2014, at the above located workplace, employees cleaning parts were exposed to the hazards associated with chemicals such as, but not limited to mineral spirits. The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g) and (h) will be met.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339785339.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.