ATHENS, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: RELIANCE CAPITAL GROUP, LLC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RELIANCE CAPITAL GROUP, LLC. in 175 WOOD LAKE PLACE, ATHENS, GA 30605 (NAICS 531311). OSHA activity number 339786444.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RELIANCE CAPITAL GROUP, LLC.
- Site address
- 175 WOOD LAKE PLACE
- City
- ATHENS
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30605
- Mailing
- 2 INDUSTRIAL WAY SUITE 300, EATONTOWN, NJ 07724
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 531311
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: On or about May 28, 2014: a) Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet while utilizing a mobile scaffold system to install stucco material to buildings, when mud sills were not used and there was no adequate foundation under the scaffold system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. On or about May 28, 2014: a) Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet while utilizing a mobile scaffold system to apply stucco material to the face of buildings, the scaffold system in use was not erected or used under the supervision of a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1260
- · Z (S) $2100
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: On or about May 28, 2014: a) Employees utilizing a mobile scaffold unit to apply stucco to residential buildings were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10.2 feet, when the employer failed to provide necessary means of fall protection on scaffold unit.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2520
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.452 W01
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(1): The mobile scaffold was not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, to prevent racking or collapse of the scaffold and secure vertical members together laterally so as to automatically square and ali(a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS)(DESCRIBE HAZARDS WHERE NECESSARY) On or about May 28, 2014 a) Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 6 and 10.2 feet while using a mobile scaffold system, That was not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.452 W07
- Issued
- Aug 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(7): When platforms were extended beyond base supports, outrigger frames or equivalent means were not used to ensure stability. On or about May 28, 2014: a) Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet while using a platform that extended beyond the base supports without any means to stabilize scaffold unit.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2520
- · Z (S) $4200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 531311)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339786444.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.