JOLIET, IL —
OSHA Inspection: SEELER INDUSTRIES, INC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SEELER INDUSTRIES, INC in ONE GENSTAR DRIVE, JOLIET, IL 60435 (NAICS 325180). OSHA activity number 339786543.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SEELER INDUSTRIES, INC
- Site address
- ONE GENSTAR DRIVE
- City
- JOLIET
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60435
- Mailing
- ONE GENSTAR DRIVE, JOLIET, IL 60435
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325180
- Employees
- 60
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 D02 I D
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(D): Process safety information pertaining to the technology of the process did not include the safe upper and lower limits for such items as temperatures, pressures, flows or compositions. Seeler Industries & Solvay Interox tank farms - On or about July 16, 2014, process safety information pertaining to the technology of the covered process (hydrogen peroxide) did not include the safe upper and lower limits for such items as temperature, pressures, flows or composition.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.119 D02 I E
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(E): Information pertaining to the technology of the process did not include an evaluation of the consequences of deviations, including those affecting the safety and health of employees. Seeler Industries & Solvay Interox tank farms - On or about July 16, 2014, process safety information pertaining to the technology of the covered process (hydrogen peroxide) did not include an evaluation of the consequences of deviations, including those affecting the safety and health of employee(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 D03 I B
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): Process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include the piping and instrument diagram (P&ID). Seeler Industries tank farm - On or about June 12, 2014, the process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the covered process (hydrogen peroxide) did not include the piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID's).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.119 D03 I D
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(D): Process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include the relief system design and design basis: Seeler Industries & Solvay Interox tank farms - On or about July 16, 2014, the process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process (hydrogen peroxide) did not include the relief system design and design bases. Employee(s) were thereby exposed to the hazards associated with the potential loss of containment and release of hydrogen peroxide.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices. Seeler Industries & Solvay Interox tank farms - On or about July 16, 2014, the employer did not document that equipment such as, but not limited to relief devices and vent systems, piping systems (including piping components such as valves), gaskets, above ground storage tanks, pumps, flow meters, temperature indicators, and level indicators complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.119 E03 V
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(v): The process hazard analysis did not address facility siting. Seeler Industries, Inc. & Solvay Interox tank farms - On or about July 16, 2014, employees were required to work in a nearby structure. The employer's initial process hazard analysis and the 2010 process hazard analysis (revalidation) did not address facility siting of occupied structures such as the No. 101 Production building.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish and implement written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment. Seeler Industries & Solvay Interox tank farms - On or about July 16, 2014, employee(s) were required to maintain the on-going integrity of the process equipment. The employer did not establish and implement written procedures to maintain the on-going mechanical integrity of process equipment such as, but not limited to flanges and gaskets.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.119 J04 II
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii): Inspection and testing procedures did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices. Seeler Industries & Solvay Interox tank farms - On or about July 16, 2014, employee(s) were required to maintain the on-going integrity of the process equipment. Inspection and testing procedures performed on process equipment such as, but not limited to above ground storage tanks, piping systems (including piping components such as valves), relief devices and vent systems, to maintain its mechanical integrity, did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Seeler Industries, INC
View Seeler Industries, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325180)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339786543.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.