Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: RAMAR HALL, INC.

Follow-up inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a follow-up safety inspection of RAMAR HALL, INC. in 26 OLD INDIAN TRAIL, MIDDLEFIELD, CT 06455 (NAICS 334519). OSHA activity number 339789505.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ramar Hall, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ramar Hall, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RAMAR HALL, INC.
Site address
26 OLD INDIAN TRAIL
City
MIDDLEFIELD
State
CT
ZIP
06455
Mailing
26 OLD INDIAN TRAIL, MIDDLEFIELD, CT 06455
Inspection type
Follow-up (F)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334519
Employees
26
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2014
Abate by
Sep 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3):  The employer did not ensure that each affected employee who wore prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involved eye hazards wore eye protection that incorporated the prescription in its design, or wore eye protection that could be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses.    ESTABLISHMENT:  The employer did not ensure that the employees wearing prescription glasses while operating grinding and/or lathing machines were wearing appropriate eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1700
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2014
Abate by
Sep 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedure to ensure that the procedure and requirements of this standard were followed:    ESTABLISHMENT:  The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedures for the equipment, such as (but not limited to) the CNC horizontal and vertical milling, CNC turning machines, to ensure the procedures were followed and to meet the requirements of this standard at all times.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1700
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazards created by in-going nip points, rotating parts, and/or flying chips and sparks:    ESTABLISHMENT:  The ingoing nip points, created by the sanding belt and pulleys were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1700
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more shall be guarded against accidental contact:    ESTABLISHMENT:  The lamp fixture for the 6" bench grinder, Sunex Tool, was missing a light bulb, and other safe means was not utilized to guard the energized screw type lampholder/socket.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1900
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.215 A04

Repeat Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work:    ESTABLISHMENT:     1.    The left abrasive wheel of the 6" bench grinder, Sunex Tool was not equipped with a work rest.    2.    The left abrasive wheel of the 6" bench grinder, JET was not equipped with work rest.    Ramar Hall, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 462458, citation number 01, item number 005(a) and was affirmed as a final order on 09/12/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 26 Old Indian Trail, Middlefield, CT 06455.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (R) $3000
  • · Z (R) $4200

1910.215 B09

Repeat Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Exposure adjustment. Safety guards of the types described in Subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this paragraph, where the operator stands in front of the opening, were not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. The maximum angular exposure above the horizontal plane of the wheel spindle as specified in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this section, and the distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top exceeded one-fourth inch. (See Figures O-18, O-19, O-20, O-21, O-22, and O-23.)  ESTABLISHMENT:    1.    The left abrasive wheel of the 6" bench grinder, Sunex Tool was not equipped with a tongue guard.  2.    The left abrasive wheel of the 6" bench grinder, JET was not equipped with a tongue guard.  Ramar Hall, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 462458, citation number 01, item number 005(b) and was affirmed as a final order on 09/12/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 26 Old Indian Trail, Middlefield, CT 06455.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (R) $0
  • · Z (R) $0

View Ramar Hall, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339789505.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.