BRIDGEWATER, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: TIOGA CONTRACTING, LLC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TIOGA CONTRACTING, LLC. in DOLLAR GENERAL, 9501 HIGHWAY 20, BRIDGEWATER, NY 13313 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 339790370.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TIOGA CONTRACTING, LLC.
- Site address
- DOLLAR GENERAL, 9501 HIGHWAY 20
- City
- BRIDGEWATER
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13313
- Mailing
- 333 GROS BOULEVARD, HERKIMER, NY 13350
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.502 H01 V
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(v): The safety monitor had other responsibilities which could take the monitor's attention from the monitoring function: a) North end of roof, on or about 6-2-14: Six employees were performing were working on a roof deck while the Safety Monitor was performing work tasks, taking his attention from his safety monitoring duties.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $3500
1926.760 A01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.760(a)(1): Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level was not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, or fall restraint systems: a) North side of roof deck, on or about 6-2-14: Six employees were installing metal roof decking while in a Controlled Decking Zone (CDZ) that did not meet specific requirements and/or qualify as a CDZ, without fall protection, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 14 to 17 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.760 C03
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.760(c)(3): The boundaries of the controlled decking zone were not clearly marked: a) West side of roof deck, on or about 6-2-14: Six employees were installing metal roof decking while in a Controlled Decking Zone (CDZ) that was more than 90 feet away from the leading edge.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $3500
1926.760 C04
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.760(c)(4) Each employee working in a CDZ did not complete CDZ training in accordance with 1926.761: a) Entire roof deck, on or about 6-2-14: Employees were installing metal roof decking while in a Controlled Decking Zone (CDZ), without completing the training required for employees working in a CDZ.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.761 C03 I
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.761(c)(3)(i): Where Controlled Decking Zones were being used, the employer did not assure that each employee had been provided training in the nature of the hazards associated with work within a controlled decking zone: a) Entire roof deck, on or about 6-2-14: Employees were installing metal roof decking while in a Controlled Decking Zone (CDZ), without the training necessary for employees to recognize the nature of the hazards associated with work within a CDZ.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.761 C03 II
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.761(c)(3)(ii): The employer did not provide training in the establishment, access, proper installation techniques and work practices required by 1926.760(c) and 1926.754(e): a) Entire roof deck, on or about 6-2-14: Employees were installing metal roof decking while in a Controlled Decking Zone (CDZ) without the training necessary for the establishment, access, proper installation techniques, and work practices required for working within a CDZ.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections at Tioga Contracting, LLC.
View Tioga Contracting, LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339790370.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.