Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: W H BAGSHAW CO. INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of W H BAGSHAW CO. INC. in 1 PINE STREET EXTENSION, NASHUA, NH 03061 (NAICS 331524). OSHA activity number 339792756.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch W H Bagshaw CO. INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for W H Bagshaw CO. INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1 PINE STREET EXTENSION
City
NASHUA
State
NH
ZIP
03061
Mailing
1 PINE STREET EXTENSION, NASHUA, NH 03061
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331524
Employees
33
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2014
Abate by
Sep 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:    a. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, prior written approval was not obtained for the fork extensions in use on the Baker (model B-30JES S/N 424405504115) electric forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2014
Abate by
Sep 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    Instance a. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, the South Bend (Cat #117G) lathe machine was not guarded at the exposed headstock/rotating chuck.    Instance b. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, the United Machine & Tool Corporation lathe machine was not guarded at the lead screw.    Instance c. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, the LeBlond (S/N 3D678) lathe machine was not guarded at the exposed headstock/rotating chuck and lead screw area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.212 A04

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 22 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2014
Abate by
Sep 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(4): Revolving drum(s), barrel(s), or container(s) were not guarded by enclosure(s) which were interlocked with the drive mechanism so that the barrel(s), drum(s), or container(s) could not revolve unless the enclosure(s) were in place:  a. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, barrier guards with interlock devices were not provided to protect employees from the 22 Baird Tumbling Barrels rotating motion during operation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2014
Abate by
Sep 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:  a. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, the GE (model 5KC49TN0034A) motor driven sander in use was not secured or anchored to the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2014
Abate by
Sep 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:    Instance a. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, the Delta (model FL 23-105) triple duty bench grinder's bilateral tongue guards were adjusted  to 1 inch away from the working surface of the grinding wheel.     Instance b. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, the Rockwell (model 438-02-014-0187) pedestal bench grinder's right side tongue guard was adjusted to a 1/2-inch away from the working surface of the grinding wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2014
Abate by
Sep 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    a. Site - on or about June 3, 2014, the Delta (model FL 23-105) triple duty bench grinder left side tool rest was adjusted to a 1/2-inch away from the working surface of the grinding wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2014
Abate by
Sep 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:    a. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, machine guarding was not provided on the separator's rotating shaft to prevent employees from coming in contact with the rotating parts during operation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2014
Abate by
Sep 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:    Instance a. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, the 4 protruding rotating shafts on the Lewis Machine Company # 2CV straighten and cutting machine were not guarded to prevent accidental contact during operation.     Instance b. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, the 4 protruding rotating shafts on the Lewis Machine Company # 2CV machine #15 straighten and cutting machine were not guarded to prevent accidental contact during operation.    Instance c. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, the 4 protruding rotating shafts on the Lewis Machine Company # 2CV machine #16 straighten and cutting machine were not guarded to prevent accidental contact during operation.    Instance d. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, the #7 Reeves Cutting Machine's rotating shaft end was not guarded and extended 3 1/2 inches into the employee's workstation.    Instance e. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, the # C-1 Reeves Cutting Machine's rotating shaft end was not guarded and extended 3 inches into the employee's workstation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.219 E03

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2014
Abate by
Sep 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3): 29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3): Vertical and inclined belts were not enclosed by a guard conforming to the standards in paragraphs specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    a. Site - On or about June 3 2014, the vertical belts used to power drive the Baird Tumbling barrels were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.145 C03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2014
Abate by
Sep 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.145(c)(3): Safety instruction sign(s) were not used where there was a need for general instructions and suggestions relative to safety measure(s):  a. Site - On or about June 3, 2014, the Citizen (Cincom L20 #3) machine's white warning instruction sticker was faded out and not legible.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View W H Bagshaw CO. INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339792756.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.