DAYTON, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: REIBER CLEANERS
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of REIBER CLEANERS in 6 WEST STROOP ROAD, DAYTON, OH 45429 (NAICS 812320). OSHA activity number 339794133.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- REIBER CLEANERS
- Site address
- 6 WEST STROOP ROAD
- City
- DAYTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45429
- Mailing
- 6 WEST STROOP ROAD, DAYTON, OH 45429
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 812320
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: (a) Employees were exposed to potential permanent eye damage while applying Rust-Go stain remover to clothes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $700
- · Z (S) $1700
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: (a) The emergency eye wash was not equipped with a quick opening valve due to damage and employees were exposed to potential permanent eye damage while applying Rust Go stain remover.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $700
- · Z (S) $1700
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: (a) The employer could not provide proof of a workplace hazard assessment through a written certification for employees performing dry cleaning operations using hazardous chemicals such as tetrachloroethylene.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Aug 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet: (a) On or about June 4, 2014, the employer did not maintain a reference list to include tetrachloroethylene, heavy duty pre-spotter and Spec-Tak as part of the hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 812320)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339794133.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.