LARGO, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: THE HOSPICE OF THE FLORIDA SUNCOAST, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of THE HOSPICE OF THE FLORIDA SUNCOAST, INC. in 11701 S. BELCHER RD. SUITE 122, LARGO, FL 33770 (NAICS 621610). OSHA activity number 339796005.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE HOSPICE OF THE FLORIDA SUNCOAST, INC.
- Site address
- 11701 S. BELCHER RD. SUITE 122
- City
- LARGO
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33770
- Mailing
- 11701 S. BELCHER RD. SUITE 122, LARGO, FL 33770
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621610
- Employees
- 1300
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a. DME - where corrosive chemicals were used during equipment operations, an eye wash station providing 15 minutes worth of flushing was not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use. Violation observed on or about 6/4/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $3000
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.: a. DME - during cleaning operations, employees were exposed to struck-by and contact hazards, in that, compressed air used with air blow nozzles connected to an air compressor was at 96 p.s.i. Violation observed on or about 6/4/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $3000
1910.1030 H05 I
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(5)(i): The employer did not establish and maintain a sharps injury log for the recording of percutaneous injuries from contaminated sharps: a. Case 1361375 - the employer's 4/6/14 sharps injury log entry did not include the device type and brand. Violation observed on or about 6/4/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $3000
1904.29 B06
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(6): The employer did not enter "privacy case" in the space normally used for the employee's name on the OSHA 300 form or equivalent: a. Case 1361375 - for the recorded 4/6/14 injury, the employer did not mark the entry as private. Violation observed on or about 6/4/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $600
- · Z (O) $1000
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not identify a document as a certification of hazard assessment: a. DME - the employer did not identify a personal protective equipment hazard assessment when employees were exposed to infection and contact hazards. Violation observed on or about 6/4/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1030 C01 V
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v): The employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control Plan, did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control plan: a. The exposure control plan did not document employee solicitation for the identification, evaluation and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls of contaminated sharps when instances of sharps injuries were observed. Violation observed on or about 6/4/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1030 F02 IV
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(iv): The employer did not ensure that employees who declined to accept the hepatitis B vaccination offered by the employer signed the statement in appendix A: a. Hepatitis B declination forms were not provided for employees that had exposures to infection hazards. Violation observed on or about 6/4/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621610)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339796005.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.