Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: NORSHIELD SECURITY PRODUCTS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NORSHIELD SECURITY PRODUCTS in 3232 MOBILE HWY., MONTGOMERY, AL 36108 (NAICS 561621). OSHA activity number 339797342.

Watch Norshield Security Products — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Norshield Security Products is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3232 MOBILE HWY.
City
MONTGOMERY
State
AL
ZIP
36108
Mailing
3232 MOBILE HWY., MONTGOMERY, AL 36108
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561621
Employees
66
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2380.00 · Current $2380.00
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a) On or about June 10, 2014 and times prior, the Jet lathe in production area: The employer failed to ensure proper guards/shield was installed to prevent metal savings from striking employees in the eye(s).  b) On or about June 10, 2014 and times prior, the Trump milling machine in production area: The employer failed to ensure proper guards/shield was installed to prevent metal savings from striking employees in the eye(s).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $595.00 · Current $595.00
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  a) On or about June 10, 2014 and times prior: The employer failed to ensure daily fork lift checks were conducted and documented to ensure no unsafe conditions exist prior to operation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $595

1910.1030 F02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(iv): The employer did not ensure that employees who declined to accept the hepatitis B vaccination offered by the employer signed the statement in appendix A:  a) On or about June 10, 2014 and times prior: The employer has designated certain employees as 1st aid responders and provided blood borne pathogen training, however, employees who declined the shots did not sign a declination letter.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the  safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a) On or about June 10, 2014 and times prior, new global harmonization training: The employer failed to train employees on the new label elements and the safety data sheet (SDS) format prior to December 1, 2013.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339797342.