CHAMPAIGN, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: R.D. COX MASONRY, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of R.D. COX MASONRY, INC. in 2000 N NEIL STREET, CHAMPAIGN, IL 61820 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339799389.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- R.D. COX MASONRY, INC.
- Site address
- 2000 N NEIL STREET
- City
- CHAMPAIGN
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61820
- Mailing
- PO BOX 255, CHAMPAIGN, IL 61824
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 11 feet 7 inches while working from a mobile frame scaffold filling mortar joints and the scaffold was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 11 feet 7 inches while working from a mobile frame scaffold filling mortar joints and each employee was not provided training on the hazards associated with working from a mobile frame scaffold and the controls to minimize the hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral pre-fabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while climbing the mobile frame scaffold and acceptable means of access on an off the scaffold was not provided for the employee.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who is involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operation, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while climbing the mobile frame scaffold and the employer had not provided training to the employee on the scaffold hazards, the design criteria and proper assembly of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 11 feet 7 inches while working from a mobile frame scaffold filling mortar joints and the scaffold did not have a suitable top rail.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered only under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 11 feet 7 inches while working from a mobile frame scaffold filling mortar joints and the scaffolding was not erected under the direction of someone acting in the capacity of a competent person before employees were allowed to access the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.452 W02
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2): Scaffold casters and wheels were not locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold was used in a stationary manner: Employees were exposed to falling up to 11 feet 7 inches while working from a mobile frame scaffold and the caster wheel was not locked.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339799389.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.