WEBSTER, TX —
OSHA Inspection: BLASTCO TEXAS INC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BLASTCO TEXAS INC in 17498 FIFE LANE, WEBSTER, TX 77598 (NAICS 562910). OSHA activity number 339800658.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BLASTCO TEXAS INC
- Site address
- 17498 FIFE LANE
- City
- WEBSTER
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77598
- Mailing
- 5514 EAST HAMPTON DRIVE, HOUSTON, TX 77039
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 562910
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.52 B
- Issued
- Oct 22, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.52(b): Employees were subjected to sound levels exceeding those listed in table D-2 of 29 CFR 1926.52 and feasible administrative or engineering controls were not utilized to reduce sound levels: Employees were exposed to continuous noise exposures that exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average of 90 decibels or an equivalent dose of one hundred percent. a) Containment Area 2; an employee performed coal slag blasting was exposed to noise levels of 752.4% of OSHA permissible exposure level. 752.4% is equivalent to 104.5dBA (8-hour time weighted average). This noise survey was conducted during a normal work shift on the Coal Slag Blaster for a sampling period of 249 minutes on 6/11/14. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 231 minutes. b) Containment Area 2, an employee performed coal slag blasting was exposed to noise levels of 778.0% of OSHA permissible exposure level. 778.0% is equivalent to 104.8 dBA (8-hour time weighted average). This noise survey was conducted during a normal work shift on the Coal Slag Blaster for a sampling period of 275 minutes on 6/11/14. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 205 minutes. c) Containment Area 2, an employee performed coal slag blasting was exposed to noise levels of 640.7% of OSHA permissible exposure level.640.7% is equivalent to 103.3 dBA (8-hour time weighted average). This noise survey was conducted during a normal work shift on the Coal Slag Blaster for a sampling period of 291 minutes on 6/11/14. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 189 minutes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Oct 22, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided in this paragraph by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels. At the facility, the employer did not conduct or maintain an audiometric testing program when employees were exposed to continuous noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average of 90 decibels.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Oct 22, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,570 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Application. Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact. At Containment Area 1; the employer did not provide employees with personal protective equipment while working with coal slag which contained substances such as but not limited to copper fume, molybdenum, manganese, zinc, beryllium, iron, vanadium, lead, cobalt metal dust & fume, and chromium during coal slag cleanup. Employees were exposed to contact and inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3570
1910.1000 A02
- Issued
- Oct 22, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,570 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Other substances -- 8-hour Time Weighted Averages. An employee's exposure to any substance in Table Z-1, the exposure limit of which is not preceded by a "C", exceeded the 8-hour Time Weighted Average given for that substance any 8-hour work shift of a 40-hour work week. At Containment Area 2; an employee was exposed to airborne concentration levels of Particulate Not Otherwise Regulated (respirable fraction) at 7.30000 mg/m3 (8 hour time-weighted average) while performing coal slag blasting operations. This exposure level is 1.46 times the OSHA permissible exposure limit of 5.000 milligrams per cubic meter. Sampling was performed on 6/11/14 during a normal work shift for a period of 278 minutes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3570
1910.134 C03
- Issued
- Oct 22, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,570 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(3): The employer did not designate a program administrator who is qualified by appropriate training or experience that is commensurate with the complexity of the program to administer or oversee the respiratory protection program and conduct the required evaluations of program effectiveness. At Containment area 2; the employer did not designate a qualified Respirator program administrator to administer the respirator program and evaluate the respirator program effectiveness, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3570
1910.134 I04 II
- Issued
- Oct 22, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(4)(ii): Cylinders of purchased breathing air did not have a certificate of analysis from the supplier that the breathing air meets the requirements for Grade D breathing air. At Containment area 2; the employer did not ensure that employees who performed coal slag blasting breathing air had a certificate of analysis that met Grade D breathing air requirements, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4900
More inspections at Blastco Texas INC
View Blastco Texas INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 562910)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339800658.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.